Why is electric potential energy U defined negative in this example?

AI Thread Summary
In the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom, electric potential energy (U) is defined as U = -k e^2 / r, with the negative sign indicating that the force between the electron and proton is attractive. This means that work must be done to separate the electron from the proton, resulting in an increase in potential energy as the distance (r) increases. The negative value of U reflects that potential energy is zero at infinite separation, analogous to a gravitational potential well. Evaluating U at different radii illustrates how the negative sign affects energy values. This understanding clarifies the concept of potential energy in both electric and gravitational contexts.
The_Lobster
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


From Young and Freedman's book University Physics, ch 23, problem 23.54:
In the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom, a single electron revolves around a single proton in a circle of radius r. Assume the proton remains at rest. ++ (the rest is irrelevant to my question).

Homework Equations


In the solution of this problem, U is defined as
Code:
U = -k e[SUP]^2[/SUP] / r
.

The Attempt at a Solution


I've been staring at this equation for a long time. I'm probably just too tired. But why a minus in front of the equation? Why not just
Code:
U = k e[SUP]^2[/SUP] / r
?

I'm feeling stupid right now! ;)

Thank you in advance:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The force is attractive--it requires work to move the electron away from the proton, thus the potential energy increases as r increases. Evaluate each expression at a few radii and see how the minus sign changes things.

(Compare a similar expression for gravitational potential energy.)
 
Thank you very much for a fast and clear explanation! All confusion is gone:)
 
Note that U = 0 at r = ∞.
 
Right right, so this electric potential energy would be analogous to a topographical "hole"... (?)
 
Yup, a potential well is the common analogy to such systems (gravitational etc.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top