Why is Far-UV spectrum unobservable

  • Thread starter Thread starter PianoDentist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spectrum
AI Thread Summary
The far-UV spectrum is largely unobservable due to strong absorption by hydrogen and interstellar dust, which intercepts radiation at these wavelengths. This absorption makes it challenging to detect emissions from astronomical sources like active galactic nuclei (AGN), particularly when the accretion disk is obscured by surrounding dust torii. Observations are further complicated by the orientation of jets in compact objects, which can obstruct the view of the disk's UV emissions. Additionally, Earth's atmosphere effectively blocks UV light, necessitating the use of space-based telescopes for such observations. Understanding these factors is crucial for studying the far-UV spectrum in astrophysics.
PianoDentist
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi

couldn't find a similar thread so thought i'd make one. I keep seeing around the web that the far-UV spectrum is unobservable (context is looking at the spectra of AGN) but no-one seems to explain why.

I think that its something to do with hydrogen strongly absorbs at these wavelengths so all the dust between us and what we're looking at intercepts all the radiation at these wavelengths.

But I am not sure if this is the case and I am not sure why hydrogen/ or interstellar dust would absorb strongly at these far UV frequencies.

if anybody can explain why the far-uv is unobservable that would be greatly appreciated!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I am inferring this from the literature on AGN I've read but I am by no means confident in what I am saying: I think the optical & UV comes mainly from the accretion disk, which is generally obscured by the dust torii that surround it if it's observed sideways. The jets get in the way for compact objects that are at smaller inclination angles wrt the jet axis. So I think that's why it might by difficult to resolve disk UV emission specifically from other structures like the NLR clouds.

"The physics of AGN at all scales" (Springer) might have the answer to your question.
 
Earths atmosphere is extremely efficient at blocking UV light - which is good because it keeps the sun from sterilizing the surface of the earth. Life on Earth was limited to the oceans until the atmosphere became oxygenated and the ozone layer formed. To observe the universe in the UV spectrum requires space based telescopes. See http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/613577/ultraviolet-telescope for discussion.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top