Exploring the Conductivity of Fire: Debunking Common Misconceptions

  • B
  • Thread starter abri
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Fire
In summary, fire is often used as a conductive material in high voltage demonstrations, but the reason for its conductivity is not clear. Some sources claim that fire is a plasma, but this is not entirely true. Other explanations contradict each other. The reality is that in a flame, many chemical reactions occur and some of these reactions produce charged ions. However, the concentration of these ions is usually very low and does not significantly affect the flame. In some cases, such as when a grass or forest fire is in close proximity to a transmission line, these ions can cause major electric utility outages. However, the exact role of ionization in these situations is unclear. The gaps in suspended strings of insulators are also critical points for potential out
  • #1
abri
10
0
Hi

Why is fire conductive?

Have encountered several examples where fire is used as a conductive material in high voltage demonstrations. However I've never gotten a straight answer as to why.

Some sources claim fire is a plasma, but that's not true. The flame of a candle is not hot enough to make plasma out of air.

Other sources give other explanations and contradict each other.

Can anyone here tell me why is fire conductive?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Watch this video and maybe it will clarify your questions:



and this one on plasmas in microwaves:

 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #3
Thanks!

Do you know if the ions are generated by collisions, or if they come from some part of the chemical reaction?


Certain chemical reactions create ions during the reaction when electrons move around, even though both the reactants and products have neutral charge.

Since the flame goes out if the field is strong enough, could that suggest that the reaction is interrupted when charged particles are pulled in opposite directions?

https://www-spof.gsfc.nasa.gov/Education/FAQs7.html#q97
Here NASA claims fire is not plasma. So that should mean a candle flame is not hot enough to generate ions from collisions alone... Or did I misunderstand something?
 
  • #4
In a flame, hundreds or thousands of chemical reactions occur. For the reaction between methane and air, we learn that $$CH_4 + 2O_2 \rightarrow CO_2 + 2H_2O$$, but the reality is much more complex. Many intermediate species are formed that react with each other (hydrogen, carbon monoxide, ...). Most of these species eventually react to carbon dioxide or water. Some of the intermediate species are charged species. In methane, this is mostly ##H_3O^+## and of course ##e^-##. The concentration of the charged species is usually very low and they usually react with each other again to form neutral species. When you put a very high potential difference over a flame, you can separate the positive and negative species, and in this way create an electrical current through the flame.

The concentration of the ionized species (the plasma density) is very low in flames and they usually do not affect the flame in any way. Ions are therefore often neglected in flame studies and we usually do not refer to a flame as a plasma. However, when you want to study the behavior of flames with high applied voltages, you will need the same equations as when you study a plasma (Maxwell's equations). The flame is then considered to be a weak plasma.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude, Drakkith and Bandersnatch
  • #5
Major electric utility outages can and do occur when there is a grass fire or forest fire in close proximity to a transmission line. Basically the entire system experiences a short at the place where smoke surrounds all of the conductors.

Example: https://www.deseretnews.com/article/749984/NM-outage-snarls-traffic-halts-basketball-tourney.html
I was at PNM then. They indicated a large grass fire was the primary cause. 2000 megawatt transmission lines from the San Juan power plant were rendered unusable for an hour.
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda
  • #6
jim mcnamara said:
Major electric utility outages can and do occur when there is a grass fire or forest fire in close proximity to a transmission line. Basically the entire system experiences a short at the place where smoke surrounds all of the conductors.

That's true, but it is unclear how much to blame ionization as compared to soot. The critical points are the gaps in the suspended strings of insulators. Salt spray near the seashore does the same thing.
suspension-insulator.png
 

Attachments

  • suspension-insulator.png
    suspension-insulator.png
    13.1 KB · Views: 1,352
  • Like
Likes berkeman and jim mcnamara
  • #7
anorlunda said:
That's true, but it is unclear how much to blame ionization as compared to soot. The critical points are the gaps in the suspended strings of insulators. Salt spray near the seashore does the same thing.
View attachment 227301
I neer understood how those things are 'self cleaning' in the rain.
 
  • #8
This brings new meaning to the classic Gene Kelly song "Singe'ing in the Rain"

 
  • #9
sophiecentaur said:
I neer understood how those things are 'self cleaning' in the rain.

The glass parts you see are like the wide brim of a hat. They keep the rain off the important part. In the image below, I colored the metal parts in red, and the air gap where actual insulating occurs as blue.

slask.png
 

Attachments

  • slask.png
    slask.png
    2.4 KB · Views: 670

1. What is the conductivity of fire?

The conductivity of fire refers to the ability of fire to transfer heat energy through a material or substance. It is a measure of how easily heat can flow through a substance, with higher conductivity meaning better heat transfer.

2. Is fire a good conductor of electricity?

No, fire is not a good conductor of electricity. In fact, it is a poor conductor because it is made up of gases and does not contain free-moving electrons that are necessary for electricity to flow.

3. Can fire conduct heat through a vacuum?

No, fire cannot conduct heat through a vacuum. While fire can produce heat, it needs a medium such as air to transfer that heat. In a vacuum, there is no medium for heat to travel through, so it cannot conduct heat.

4. Is it safe to touch fire if you are wearing rubber gloves?

No, it is not safe to touch fire even if you are wearing rubber gloves. While rubber is a good insulator, it is not capable of protecting against the extreme heat of fire. It is important to always use proper safety precautions when handling fire.

5. Can fire conduct heat faster than other materials?

It depends on the specific materials being compared. Generally, metals are better conductors of heat than fire. However, some materials, such as wood and plastic, can ignite and burn quickly, making them seem like faster conductors of heat compared to fire. It is important to consider the specific heat capacities and thermal conductivities of different materials when comparing their ability to conduct heat.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
351
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Cosmology
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top