B Why is Fire Considered Conductive?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter abri
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fire
AI Thread Summary
Fire is considered conductive due to the presence of charged species formed during chemical reactions, despite flames generally being classified as weak plasmas. While some sources incorrectly label fire as plasma, the flame's temperature is insufficient to generate plasma from air. High voltage applications can cause ion separation in flames, creating an electrical current, which can lead to utility outages when fires affect transmission lines. The role of ionization in conductivity is debated, with soot and other factors also contributing to electrical shorts. Understanding the complex interactions in flames is essential for studying their behavior under electrical stress.
abri
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi

Why is fire conductive?

Have encountered several examples where fire is used as a conductive material in high voltage demonstrations. However I've never gotten a straight answer as to why.

Some sources claim fire is a plasma, but that's not true. The flame of a candle is not hot enough to make plasma out of air.

Other sources give other explanations and contradict each other.

Can anyone here tell me why is fire conductive?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Watch this video and maybe it will clarify your questions:



and this one on plasmas in microwaves:

 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
Thanks!

Do you know if the ions are generated by collisions, or if they come from some part of the chemical reaction?


Certain chemical reactions create ions during the reaction when electrons move around, even though both the reactants and products have neutral charge.

Since the flame goes out if the field is strong enough, could that suggest that the reaction is interrupted when charged particles are pulled in opposite directions?

https://www-spof.gsfc.nasa.gov/Education/FAQs7.html#q97
Here NASA claims fire is not plasma. So that should mean a candle flame is not hot enough to generate ions from collisions alone... Or did I misunderstand something?
 
In a flame, hundreds or thousands of chemical reactions occur. For the reaction between methane and air, we learn that $$CH_4 + 2O_2 \rightarrow CO_2 + 2H_2O$$, but the reality is much more complex. Many intermediate species are formed that react with each other (hydrogen, carbon monoxide, ...). Most of these species eventually react to carbon dioxide or water. Some of the intermediate species are charged species. In methane, this is mostly ##H_3O^+## and of course ##e^-##. The concentration of the charged species is usually very low and they usually react with each other again to form neutral species. When you put a very high potential difference over a flame, you can separate the positive and negative species, and in this way create an electrical current through the flame.

The concentration of the ionized species (the plasma density) is very low in flames and they usually do not affect the flame in any way. Ions are therefore often neglected in flame studies and we usually do not refer to a flame as a plasma. However, when you want to study the behavior of flames with high applied voltages, you will need the same equations as when you study a plasma (Maxwell's equations). The flame is then considered to be a weak plasma.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude, Drakkith and Bandersnatch
Major electric utility outages can and do occur when there is a grass fire or forest fire in close proximity to a transmission line. Basically the entire system experiences a short at the place where smoke surrounds all of the conductors.

Example: https://www.deseretnews.com/article/749984/NM-outage-snarls-traffic-halts-basketball-tourney.html
I was at PNM then. They indicated a large grass fire was the primary cause. 2000 megawatt transmission lines from the San Juan power plant were rendered unusable for an hour.
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda
jim mcnamara said:
Major electric utility outages can and do occur when there is a grass fire or forest fire in close proximity to a transmission line. Basically the entire system experiences a short at the place where smoke surrounds all of the conductors.

That's true, but it is unclear how much to blame ionization as compared to soot. The critical points are the gaps in the suspended strings of insulators. Salt spray near the seashore does the same thing.
suspension-insulator.png
 

Attachments

  • suspension-insulator.png
    suspension-insulator.png
    13.1 KB · Views: 1,428
  • Like
Likes berkeman and jim mcnamara
anorlunda said:
That's true, but it is unclear how much to blame ionization as compared to soot. The critical points are the gaps in the suspended strings of insulators. Salt spray near the seashore does the same thing.
View attachment 227301
I neer understood how those things are 'self cleaning' in the rain.
 
This brings new meaning to the classic Gene Kelly song "Singe'ing in the Rain"

 
sophiecentaur said:
I neer understood how those things are 'self cleaning' in the rain.

The glass parts you see are like the wide brim of a hat. They keep the rain off the important part. In the image below, I colored the metal parts in red, and the air gap where actual insulating occurs as blue.

slask.png
 

Attachments

  • slask.png
    slask.png
    2.4 KB · Views: 737
Back
Top