myrtleza
- 1
- 0
And why can't food be cooked with X-rays or radio waves?
The discussion explores the differences in how food is cooked by microwaves compared to an infrared grill, focusing on the mechanisms of heat transfer, the role of water in food, and the effects of different types of radiation on food properties. The conversation includes theoretical considerations, practical observations, and some experimental anecdotes.
Participants generally agree on the basic principles of how microwaves and infrared grills operate, but there are multiple competing views regarding the specifics of molecular interactions and the implications for cooking. The discussion remains unresolved on certain technical details, particularly regarding the behavior of ice in microwaves.
Some limitations are noted regarding the assumptions made about molecular behavior and the conditions under which experiments are conducted. The discussion reflects a range of perspectives on the effectiveness of different cooking methods without reaching a consensus on all points.
This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring the science of cooking, the physics of heat transfer, and those curious about the properties of materials in relation to different forms of energy. It may also appeal to those engaged in experimental cooking techniques or food science.
Mentz114 said:( water ?)
This I knew - though I'd assumed the idea was to try to not actually cook the food before it had had a chance to thaw.mgb_phys said:The defrost setting on your microwave actually turns the power on and off for 5-10secs, allowing the microwave generated heat in the melted part to transmit to the still frozen part.
But this I did not know!mgb_phys said:Ice is almost transparent to microwaves, the bond resonance in ice is very differnet to the bond in water.
Defennder said:Does resonance here mean the same thing as "delocalization"?
If he was putting the ice in the microwave, why did he have to put the microwave in the freezer?gamesguru said:The way microwaves work is by hitting a resonance frequency of water, I forget which one it is but I don't think it's the first. It would be possible to hit another resonance with x-rays but it is easier to hit lower resonances.
My adviser was doing an experiment to test if ice would melt in a microwave. It was quite a challenge to get a freezer large enough and cold enough for the microwave to fit in and for the ice to stay solid. When he finally got what he needed, the ice didn't melt. Fifteen minutes in the microwave and not a drop of water, pretty amazing.
DaveC426913 said:If he was putting the ice in the microwave, why did he have to put the microwave in the freezer?
So he had to cool the air that was inside the microwave, and, I suppose, the inner walls of the oven itself. OK.Nick89 said:Because ice melts in room temperature... If you want to show that a microwave doesn't melt ice then you can't just put a block of ice in, see it melt and then say "well that was because the room is hot enough for the ice to melt, but the microwave didn't have anything to do with it, honest!"...
Yes but it has no effect on ice, thus it is something specific about the liquid water bonds that cause the heating. I wasn't sure if the previous posts were refuting that.Nick89 said:As far as I know, they are causing the water molecules to vibrate and rotate around which generates heat.
Water molecules are dipoles, which essentially means that their charge distribution is not perfectly symmetrical. One side of the molecule is more positive then the other (or less negative whichever way you look at it). The microwaves are essentially oscillating electric and magnetic fields, to which the charges in the water molecules react (by rotating).
DaveC426913 said:Yes but it has no effect on ice, thus it is something specific about the liquid water bonds that cause the heating. I wasn't sure if the previous posts were refuting that.