Why Is Instantaneous Value Used in Amplitude Modulation?

AI Thread Summary
In amplitude modulation, the instantaneous value of the information signal is used to accurately represent the signal's voltage over time, as shown in the equation V=(Ec+Ei*coswt)coswt. The peak value does not provide a complete picture since it only indicates the maximum amplitude, while the instantaneous value reflects the signal's behavior at all moments. The equation incorporates two frequencies: the carrier frequency (ωc) and the modulating frequency (ωi), which are essential for understanding the signal's dynamics. The envelope of the modulating signal is represented by "Ei*coswt," and maintaining Ei at or below Ec is crucial to avoid distortion and excessive sidebands. Thus, using the instantaneous value is vital for preserving the integrity of the amplitude-modulated signal.
rahuld.exe
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
In the amplitude modulation equation,
V=(Ec+Ei*coswt)coswt

I don't understand why the instantaneous value of information signal is used. Shouldnt it be peak value as that would give the maximum value (amplitude)?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
rahuld.exe said:
In the amplitude modulation equation,
V=(Ec+Ei*coswt)coswt

I don't understand why the instantaneous value of information signal is used. Shouldnt it be peak value as that would give the maximum value (amplitude)?

There is an error here. There are two frequencies (ω) involved. ωc and ωi, where the suffices correspond to Carrier and Input (?) / Modulating signal (the same as the E suffices).
The equation tells you the value (in volts) of the signal, V at all times. It's what you will see on an oscilloscope. The maximum amplitude, for your equation, would be Ec + Ei and doesn't involve any Cos functions.
"Ei*coswt" is the shape of the envelope (the cosinusoidal modulating signal). If you want undistorted AM, Ei must be no greater than Ec. If it gets bigger then the phase of the carrier undergoes an abrupt change and this will involve a 'splash' which generates a large number of sidebands both in and out of band. (Not to be recommended)
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top