Why is it so hard to explain friction?

AI Thread Summary
Friction is a complex phenomenon that, while well-described on a macro level, lacks a complete understanding at the atomic level due to the irregularity of surfaces and the multitude of microscopic processes involved. The discussion highlights that friction coefficients are often derived empirically, as there is no universally applicable predictive model. The confusion around friction often arises from its dual role in different contexts, such as how it can both drive a car forward and slow it down. While there is a working microscopic model of friction, its complexity stems from various material interactions and conditions. Ultimately, the challenge lies in the intricate nature of friction rather than a fundamental lack of understanding.
Almada R
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
While in class, my Thermodynamics professor came up with an interesting fact, that neither I nor my colleagues were ever aware of: While you may have heard that friction influenciates the movement in Newtonian Mechanics, no one really knows what friction is.
And so I have been wandering why it is so hard to explain something that is so natural to us? What are the physics behind this? Hope you can help clarify my doubt.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Err, what? As far as I am aware, we know exactly what friction is. Can you elaborate a bit on what you mean?
 
Friction is an average behavior. At the molecular level, surfaces are very irregular. Stressing a crystal lattice by pushing it, is a molecular level problem.

I think what the professor meant, is that without complete knowledge of the atoms in the materials, we can not have detailed knowledge of the forces.

In particle physics, quantum mechanics and Newton's laws apply and there is no friction.

But on a macro level, the average behavior is very well described by friction.
 
Yeah, just like people say no one really knows what gravity is. :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50, Bystander and davenn
Another "I don't understand it so nobody understands it" thread.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
anorlunda said:
I think what the professor meant, is that without complete knowledge of the atoms in the materials, we can not have detailed knowledge of the forces.
Or that we don't have a useful general predictive model for friction coefficients. We usually derive them empirically, without knowing/caring what actually happens on the microscopic level.
 
  • Like
Likes Almada R and sophiecentaur
A.T. said:
Or that we don't have a useful general predictive model for friction coefficients.

The key word is "useful". There certainly is a working microscopic model. It's complicated because what we call "friction" corresponds to multiple microscopic processes. It's complicated because even in simple systems many different materials are involved: a piece of aluminum can have aluminum, three different oxides, and many different contaminants, all contributing. It's complicated because you have grain boundaries, orientations, and, and, and...

But this is saying that this is a complex problem, not that there is a fundamental lack of understanding. Nobody would say we don't understand atomic physics just because we can't calculate the color of lead (82 electrons) from the Schroedinger Equation.
 
  • Like
Likes Aaron Crowl, Almada R, russ_watters and 1 other person
One aspect of friction that seems to confuse a lot of people is how to decide on the direction that a friction force is acting. When a car is accelerating, people have a problem with the fact that it's friction between wheels and ground that drives the car forward and yet we say that friction slows things down. But that's because people want to apply a simple rule to every situation without thinking it through. It's not a problem really.
 
  • Like
Likes Almada R

Similar threads

Back
Top