Why is my car acceleration not matching the calculated force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jonsson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Car
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the discrepancy between the calculated force required for a car's acceleration and the force derived from the engine's torque. The car, weighing 900 kg, accelerates to 27.7 m/s in 8 seconds, suggesting a force of 3116 N, while the torque calculation yields only 666 N. The key issue identified is the neglect of gear ratios, which significantly affect the effective torque delivered to the wheels. The conversation highlights the importance of considering the gearbox and final drive ratios in calculating acceleration forces. Overall, the analysis must account for multiple gears during acceleration to accurately reflect the car's performance.
Jonsson
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Hello there,

Just got an old car, and I was looking at the specifications, and trying to teach myself Newtonian physics. But I cannot get it to work out correctly. Please tell me where I go wrong.

The car weighs 900 kg. The engine has 200nm of torque, it accelerates from still to 27.7 m/s in 8 seconds. The radius from the center of the drive axle to the outside of the tire is circa 0.3m.

F = m\,a

Assuming constant acceleration:

F = m\frac{v}{t}

F = 900\mathrm{ kg}\frac{27.7\mathrm{ m/s}}{8\mathrm{ s}}

F = 3116\,\mathrm{ N}

So, to go from zero to 100km/h in 8 seconds takes 3116 N. This is not taking aerodynamic drag and drivetrain friction into account.

This is where I go wrong I think. The car has 200 Nm of torque:

\tau = 200\,\mathrm{Nm}

I have an arm of 0.3m (the distance from the centre of the wheel to the outside of the tyre)

F = \frac{\tau}{r}

F = 666 N

The problem is 3116\,\mathrm{ N} >> 666\,\mathrm{ N}

And this is without even taken aerodynamic drag and drivetrain losses/friction and all of that jazz into account.

How come my maths is off by so much?

Thank you for your time.

Kind regards,
Marius

NOTE: Looks like my numbers may be off by a factor of 2∏ ? Not sure where it should go though.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to take the gear into account, it can increase the torque (and reduce the rotation frequency).

Quick check: a typical wheel has a diameter of ~50cm. At 30m/s, it rotates with 1200rpm. That is not the range where you operate the engine to accelerate.
 
These are the gear ratios of the car:


1st 3.80 : 1
2nd 2.06 : 1
3rd 1.26 : 1
4th .89 : 1

final drive ratio 4.125 : 1

Do you think I am right in multiplying the ratio of the gear with the differential final drive ratio?

F = 200Nm * gear ratio * final_drive_ratio/0.3m

Thank you for your time.

Kind regards,
Marius
 
That's what a gearbox is for. You have a higher overall gear ratio when starting in first gear to keep the engine from stalling. Once the car is moving, you change gears to reduce the overall ratio until you reach the point where the wheels are rotating at a speed which won't cause the engine to stall, and the engine is turning at sufficient RPM to keep the car moving at a constant travel speed.

When you are accelerating to speed, unless you do it in a single gear, the analysis in the OP is not valid.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top