Why Is My Coil Suppressor Circuit Allowing Voltages Above 130V?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wingsofdesire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coil module
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design and functionality of a coil suppressor circuit intended to limit voltages above 130V using a VDR RC circuit. Participants explore the circuit's performance, the specifications of components, and alternative protection methods for an electromagnetic contactor coil operating at 110V DC.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their circuit using a 47-ohm resistor, a 0.1nF capacitor, and a 130V VDR, questioning why voltages above 130V are still present.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on the term "VDR" and requests a schematic of the circuit.
  • A participant clarifies that "VDR" refers to a varistor and provides context about its use as a protection device for a relay or contactor.
  • Concerns are raised about the application and effectiveness of the circuit, particularly regarding the specifications of the VDR and its breakdown characteristics.
  • One participant suggests that the VDR may not be operating correctly, noting that VDRs typically require a higher voltage to break down than their rated voltage.
  • Another participant recommends using a reverse-biased power diode in parallel with the coil for better protection against inductive voltage kicks, suggesting that a resistor and capacitor may not be necessary.
  • Further inquiries are made about the specific application and the necessity of clamping the voltage tightly, as well as the type of current being switched by the contactor.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of the current circuit design and the necessity of using a VDR versus a diode for protecting the contactor coil. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal approach to voltage clamping and the specifications of the components used.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of understanding the specifications and tolerances of VDRs, as well as the potential need for alternative protection methods depending on the application and load characteristics.

wingsofdesire
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I am trying to make a coil suppressor to restrict any voltage above say 130v. It is a simple VDR RC circuit. I am using a resistance of 47ohm, 250v and a capacitor of .1nF 250v a VDR of 130v. But the circuit is not working as expected. Is it because of the voltage spec of resistance and capacitor? Should it not restrict any voltage above 130v. But when am testing it, voltages above 130v are passing through it.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
wingsofdesire said:
I am trying to make a coil suppressor to restrict any voltage above say 130v. It is a simple VDR RC circuit. I am using a resistance of 47ohm, 250v and a capacitor of .1nF 250v a VDR of 130v. But the circuit is not working as expected. Is it because of the voltage spec of resistance and capacitor? Should it not restrict any voltage above 130v. But when am testing it, voltages above 130v are passing through it.

What is a VDR? Can you attach a schematic of the circuit?
 
berkeman said:
What is a VDR? Can you attach a schematic of the circuit?

Am very sorry, its a varistor. I am attaching a schematic. Am using it as a protection device for a type of relay or contactor to save from the over voltage during turn on and turn off. The working voltage is mainly 110v so i wanted to limit the maximum voltage to a maximum of 130v. Basically a RC Varistor type snubber. Is there a necessity of a fuse for that purpose?
 

Attachments

  • vdr.jpg
    vdr.jpg
    5 KB · Views: 748
Your application is still not clear. Is this 110VAC? Can you show the drive circuit and coil also. Also, in what way is it not working as expected?
 
Your circuit is correct and will protect most switch or relay contacts from arc damage.

The VDR you have specified at 130V is, I suspect, probably not operating. Unlike zener diodes, VDRs are specified not to break down at the specified voltage. It usually takes about 50% more before they breakdown and they then hold at maybe 20% above the specified voltage.

Also, a symmetrical protection diode or VDR rated 130V will probably be rated as 130V RMS, which is 185V peak, then add the 50%. You must study the data sheet carefully when designing with VDRs to identify the tolerances.

A ZnO varistor has a lifetime determined by the number and magnitude of breakdown events. It should not be asked to perform continuously.

An RC snubber as you have shown will handle slightly inductive loads that switch rarely. Maybe if you are switching highly inductive loads you should consider using a Triac with an optoisolator rather than a relay.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Baluncore said:
Your circuit is correct and will protect most switch or relay contacts from arc damage.

The VDR you have specified at 130V is, I suspect, probably not operating. Unlike zener diodes, VDRs are specified not to break down at the specified voltage. It usually takes about 50% more before they breakdown and they then hold at maybe 20% above the specified voltage.

Also, a symmetrical protection diode or VDR rated 130V will probably be rated as 130V RMS, which is 185V peak, then add the 50%. You must study the data sheet carefully when designing with VDRs to identify the tolerances.

A ZnO varistor has a lifetime determined by the number and magnitude of breakdown events. It should not be asked to perform continuously.

An RC snubber as you have shown will handle slightly inductive loads that switch rarely. Maybe if you are switching highly inductive loads you should consider using a Triac with an optoisolator rather than a relay.

The Contactor will handle slightly inductive load. But i need to restrict the voltage to a maximum of 120v-130v. This is the reason i used the 130v vdr. But i didnot have the knowledge about the same. I have to use the same vdr rc citcuit for space and drawing constraints but what is the more efficient way to do this? How how much in approximation should i change the VDR rating to get better results. Please help out.
 
It is a bit difficult trying to help when I do not know what you are trying to do, or why the voltage must be clamped so tightly.

You have referred to a contactor. Is it the contacts of that contactor that you are trying to protect ?
Is the contactor switching AC or DC current ? What is the RMS / DC voltage ?
 
Baluncore said:
It is a bit difficult trying to help when I do not know what you are trying to do, or why the voltage must be clamped so tightly.

You have referred to a contactor. Is it the contacts of that contactor that you are trying to protect ?
Is the contactor switching AC or DC current ? What is the RMS / DC voltage ?

I am actually trying to protect the coil here. Yes this is basically an electro magnetic contactor, and the working voltage of the coil is 110v. The contactor works in DC voltage. To protect the coil from surge i am using it as a protection device.
 
If you have a contactor coil being driven by a DC current, then the best protection of the coil and it's driver is to place a reverse biassed power diode in parallel with the coil. No VDR is needed.

The inductive voltage kick when the coil begins to turn off is clamped by the diode which carries the coil current while the magnetic field decays. The diode must be able to handle a surge current equal to the contactor coil current. A resistor and capacitor are not usually needed in that situation, but they will reduce the voltage slew rate.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flyback_diode

I hope that answers your question.
If not, ask more specific questions and/or attach a circuit diagram of that part of the circuit.
You can enable email notification of replies by using thread tools at the top of the thread.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
93
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K