Why is normal force in the direction of vector normal?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the normal force exerted by an inclined plane on an object resting on it. Participants explore whether the normal force is inherently directed normal to the surface due to experimental observations, conventions, or other reasons. The conversation touches on concepts of friction, smooth surfaces, and the balance of forces in a physics context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the normal force being directed normal to the incline is based on experimental findings or merely a convention.
  • Others clarify that the total force acting on an object on an incline is not purely normal but can be resolved into components, with the normal force being one of them.
  • A few participants assert that the normal force is defined as perpendicular to the surface, regardless of the surface's smoothness or roughness.
  • There are discussions about the implications of a frictionless surface, where the absence of tangential forces leads to the conclusion that the normal force must be the only force acting in the normal direction.
  • Some participants emphasize that the reaction force is not necessarily normal to the plane in all cases, and the tangential component can be negligible under certain conditions.
  • One participant suggests that understanding the normal force as a definition of frictionlessness is valid, but questions about the nature of the force in slippery conditions are also important to explore.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the normal force is inherently directed normal to the surface or if it can vary based on conditions such as friction. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the nature of the normal force and its relationship to the incline.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the analysis of forces on an incline involves assumptions about friction and surface characteristics, which may not hold in all scenarios. The discussion highlights the complexity of force interactions without reaching a consensus on the fundamental nature of the normal force.

hihiip201
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
This might be a bit philosophical, but is this just from experiment? that for a really really smooth surface, people found that the net force on an incline surface is found to be approximately in the direction normal to the incline plane? (approximately because there's no perfectly smooth surface, unless you use a magnetic plate i guess).


But are there any other reason, maybe just convention? that normal force is in the direction of normal to an incline plane?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course, the total force is not normal but tangential to the surface of the (idealized) inclined plane. The reason is that the component of the gravitational force normal to the inclined plane is compensated by the contact forces exerted by the plane to the body on the plane.
 
" that normal force is in the direction of normal to an incline plane? "
Correct.
In addition, the surface will usually exert a force tangential to itself, we Call that typically the force of friction.
 
vanhees71 said:
Of course, the total force is not normal but tangential to the surface of the (idealized) inclined plane. The reason is that the component of the gravitational force normal to the inclined plane is compensated by the contact forces exerted by the plane to the body on the plane.



I'm aware of the force analysis of an object on an incline plane, my question is, how do we know that the force exerted on an object by an incline plane must be normal
 
Maybe I should clarify what I'm asking.

My question is, why, or how do we know that the normal exerted on an object by an incline plane must be normal to the plane itself. Experiment? or convention?
 
hi hihiip201! :smile:
hihiip201 said:
My question is, why, or how do we know that the normal exerted on an object by an incline plane must be normal to the plane itself. Experiment? or convention?

(you mean the reaction force exerted :wink:)

we don't know …

if the reaction force is normal, we say the plane is frictionless

if the reaction force isn't, we don't​
 
The normal force is perpendicular to the surface. It does not matter if the surface is smooth or rough. It is used to set up your FBD ( free body diagram ) so you can solve the problem at hand.

Other forces such as gravity or friction may make the resultant force offset at an angle to the perpendicular to the surface. Do not confuse the normal force with the resultant force.

See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_normal
for the definition of a normal vecrtor
 
If the surface is smooth and frictionless then it doesn't resist sliding on the surface, i.e. there is no force tangential to the surface. However, since the surface is solid and you can't go through it, it will resist any normal force, since a net normal force would make the object move through the plane and the plane just resists that.
 
As others have alluded to, the force exerted by the inclined plane on a body in contact with the plane is not necessarily normal to the plane. The force can always be resolved into two components, one tangent to the plane, and the other normal to the plane. The component normal to the plane is typically referred to as the "normal force."
 
  • #10
Chestermiller said:
As others have alluded to, the force exerted by the inclined plane on a body in contact with the plane is not necessarily normal to the plane. The force can always be resolved into two components, one tangent to the plane, and the other normal to the plane. The component normal to the plane is typically referred to as the "normal force."



I'm sorry, Maybe I should ask my question again with more precision.


Why is the reaction force of an incline, frictionless surface, necessarily in the normal direction of the plane.

how do we know, that for a smooth surface, the reaction force necessarily exert a force that is only normal to its plane. Did they physicists back then used that as a model to solve problems, and find that it generally works?
 
  • #11
chingel said:
If the surface is smooth and frictionless then it doesn't resist sliding on the surface, i.e. there is no force tangential to the surface. However, since the surface is solid and you can't go through it, it will resist any normal force, since a net normal force would make the object move through the plane and the plane just resists that.
so I guess the logic here is :

the direction of which motion is restricted = the direction of force?
 
  • #12
hihiip201 said:
Why is the reaction force of an incline, frictionless surface, necessarily in the normal direction of the plane.

how do we know, that for a smooth surface, the reaction force necessarily exert a force that is only normal to its plane.

i repeat …
if the reaction force is normal, we say the plane is frictionless

if the reaction force isn't, we don't​
 
  • #13
tiny-tim said:
i repeat …
if the reaction force is normal, we say the plane is frictionless

if the reaction force isn't, we don't​

ok, I have the reasoning backward then.

thanks
 
  • #14
But you should understand it backwards also if you happen to have such a question. It can be taken as a definition, that if the force is normal, the plane is frictionless, but asking it the other way around, if the plane is frictionless (having some concept of friction beforehand, i.e. the plane is slippery, doesn't brake sliding etc), why is the force normal, is a perfectly acceptable question and you should keep on asking it until you feel that you can understand it.

First it is important to understand that the force normal to the plane has to be balanced, since the object cannot go through the plane. If there is an unbalanced force in a certain direction on an object, the object will start accelerating in that direction.

Then it is important to understand that if the plane is slippery, there is no resistance in moving across the plane, that means that there is no force from the plane against the direction of motion. Since there is no component of force parallel to the plane, it means that the total force from the plane is normal.
 
  • #15
hihiip201 said:
I'm sorry, Maybe I should ask my question again with more precision.


Why is the reaction force of an incline, frictionless surface, necessarily in the normal direction of the plane.

how do we know, that for a smooth surface, the reaction force necessarily exert a force that is only normal to its plane. Did they physicists back then used that as a model to solve problems, and find that it generally works?
If you resolve the contact force between the inclined plane and the body into components normal and tangential to the plane, and I tell you that the tangential component (commonly referred to as the frictional force) is equal to zero, that leaves only the normal component (which then is equal to the resultant contact force). In general, the reaction force is not normal to the plane, even for a smooth surface. But the tangential component cannot be greater than the normal component times the coefficient of static friction. If the coefficient of static friction is very low, as it is for many materials (e.g., ice), then the tangential component is very small. In the limit of zero coefficient of static friction, the tangential component (frictional force) is equal to zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K