Why is pi = 16 arctan(1/5) - 4 arctan( 1/139)

  • Thread starter Thread starter joex444
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pi
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mathematical identity π = 16arctan(1/5) - 4arctan(1/239). Participants explore the derivation of this formula using the series expansion for arctan(x), which includes terms that converge to π. The relationship is confirmed through calculations, though there is uncertainty about its precision beyond certain decimal places. The reference to Machin's formula highlights its historical significance in calculating π. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the mathematical foundations and verification methods for this intriguing identity.
joex444
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Not actually a HW question, but, is there a quick explanation that could show why:

\pi = 16\arctan(\frac{1}{5}) - 4\arctan(\frac{1}{239})

I read that somewhere, and it turned out to be true, so I was just wondering how that came about...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We have the series expansion:
Tan^{-1}(x) = \frac {\pi} 2 - \frac 1 x + \frac 1 {3x^3} - \frac 1 {5x^5} ...
By working with this you should be able to verify your claim. It is not clear to me whether your relationship is exact or just good to more decimal places then are being displayed.
 
Last edited:
http://mcraefamily.com/MathHelp/GeometryTrigEquiv.htm (see Machin's formula)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top