Why is the 1/2 important in the equation Ek = 1/2mv^2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FakeGeek
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation Ek = 1/2mv^2 defines kinetic energy, where the '1/2' is crucial for accurately representing the relationship between mass, velocity, and energy. This factor arises during the derivation from the work-energy principle, specifically when calculating work done on an object. Without the '1/2', the equation would incorrectly suggest that kinetic energy increases linearly with velocity rather than quadratically. The inclusion of '1/2' ensures that kinetic energy reflects the correct physical behavior of moving objects. Therefore, Ek cannot be simplified to mv^2 without losing essential accuracy in its representation.
FakeGeek
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


ok..so we know that Ek is by definition 1/2mv^2.
my question is that since Ek is simply defined to be that much..why does the 1/2 matter..
cant we simply write it as Ek = mv^2?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
The '1/2' comes into effect during the derivation of the formula for Ek using the basic definition of work done.
 
  • Like
Likes adib npm

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

With a circular orbit, when do I use 1/2mv^2
Replies
6
Views
3K
Force and change in momentum in an inelastic/elastic collision
Replies
19
Views
3K
Speed on an object given F and Ek....
Replies
3
Views
1K
Calculating Maximum Height of an Arrow with Loss of Mechanical Energy
Replies
6
Views
2K
Energy and Momentum [Spring (word problem)]
Replies
3
Views
2K
Change in the Kinetic Energy of a System
Replies
2
Views
2K
Conservation of Energy With Friction
Replies
10
Views
2K
Conservation of Energy with heat
Replies
5
Views
2K
Critical Velocity in a roller coaster cart
Replies
1
Views
3K
How to calculate the total energy in the point given.
Replies
10
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top