I Why is the absorption depth for GaAs more than for Germanium?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter A Sofyan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absorption Depth
A Sofyan
It is based on the value of the edge coefficient I obtained, for Germanium at the wavelength of 1550 nm has a value of 459.54 / cm and GaAs at wavelength 885.6 nm has a value of 239.78 / cm.

If based on the theory of absorption depth (1 / alpha), then the optimal thickness of GaAs is thicker than Ge, and to my knowledge, this seems to be wrong in the application, can anyone explain? Is there something wrong with my understanding?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both materials, if I'm not mistaken, are in a transition from being opaque at shorter wavelengths to starting to become transmissive at 1550 nm. Is there any reason you think Ge should be more transmissive than GaAs at this particular wavelength?
 
Charles Link said:
Both materials, if I'm not mistaken, are in a transition from being opaque at shorter wavelengths to starting to become transmissive at 1550 nm. Is there any reason you think Ge should be more transmissive than GaAs at this particular wavelength?
It is based on the value of the edge coefficient I obtained, for Germanium at the wavelength of 1550 nm has a value of 459.54 / cm and GaAs at wavelength 885.6 nm has a value of 239.78 / cm.
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top