B Why is the CMB relatively uniform?

AI Thread Summary
The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) is uniform across the sky due to a rapid inflationary period shortly after the Big Bang, which caused the universe to expand quickly and evenly. This expansion occurred everywhere simultaneously, meaning there is no specific point from which everything emanated, countering the misconception that the Big Bang was a singular point. Gravity's influence was negligible during this early phase, allowing for uniform distribution. The concept of a "singularity" in the Big Bang theory does not imply a physical point but rather a breakdown of our mathematical models. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping fundamental cosmological concepts.
hewiiitt-
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This might be a stupid question due to a simplistic under standing of the Big Bang. But why is the CMB uniform across the sky. Why is it not sognificantly higher on one side from the other. Surely if the Big Bang was a point then everything would eminate from that point resulting in one side that was closer having higher reading. Thanks for any answers. Sorry if it is a stupid question.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It's not just a good question, but an exceedingly important one in cosmology.

One popular notion is that very shortly after the birth of the universe, it entered an inflationary period of unimaginably rapid expansion so that by the time gravity could have a significant effect, things were already spread out pretty uniformly.

As far as where the big bang happened, it kind of happened everywhere. Space itself just got really big really quickly.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and hewiiitt-
jfizzix said:
It's not just a good question, but an exceedingly important one in cosmology.

One popular notion is that very shortly after the birth of the universe, it entered an inflationary period of unimaginably rapid expansion so that by the time gravity could have a significant effect, things were already spread out pretty uniformly.

As far as where the big bang happened, it kind of happened everywhere. Space itself just got really big really quickly.

Thanks for the quick response
 
jfizzix said:
It's not just a good question, but an exceedingly important one in cosmology.

One popular notion is that very shortly after the birth of the universe, it entered an inflationary period of unimaginably rapid expansion so that by the time gravity could have a significant effect, things were already spread out pretty uniformly.

As far as where the big bang happened, it kind of happened everywhere. Space itself just got really big really quickly.

Just thinking though for this to out run gravity wouldn't things have had to move faster than the speed of light.
 
Yes, but there's no cosmic speed limit for the expansion of the universe. The only speed limit is on how fast things can move through space.
 
hewiiitt- said:
Surely if the Big Bang was a point ...
This is by far the most common misconception is the early study of cosmology and is promulgated by pop-science making exactly that false statement. The "big bang singularity" was NOT a point. It happened everywhere at once. The "big bang theory" doesn't even include the singularity but instead is a discussion of what happened from about one Plank Time after the singularity to today. Contrary to the totally incorrect statements you see everywhere in pop-science, "singularity" does not mean "point" it means "the place where our math model breaks down and gives nonphysical results and we don't know WHAT is/was going on"
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
172
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
103
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top