I Why is the E-field inside a solid conducting sphere zero?

AI Thread Summary
The electric field inside a solid conducting sphere is zero because charges within the conductor rearrange themselves to cancel any external electric fields. When a net charge is placed on the sphere, charges repel and distribute symmetrically on the surface, ensuring no internal field. If an external charge is present, the internal charges still adjust, but the arrangement may not be symmetric, yet the field remains zero. The presence of mobile charge carriers allows the conductor to respond to external fields, leading to this cancellation. This phenomenon is supported by potential theory and can be analyzed using the method of image charges.
OmegaKV
Messages
22
Reaction score
1
The common explanation is this: If the conductor has a net charge, then the charges repel each other until they arrange themselves symmetrically around the outside of the sphere, and if you do the math the electric field will cancel out everywhere inside the conducting sphere.

Alright, but what if the charge is placed on a point outside of the sphere instead of on the sphere? If you keep the charge separate from the conducting sphere, then the charges won't be able to arrange themselves symmetrically around the sphere to make the electric field inside the conductor cancel out. What keeps the electric field inside the conductor zero in this case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OmegaKV said:
If you keep the charge separate from the conducting sphere, then the charges won't be able to arrange themselves symmetrically around the sphere to make the electric field inside the conductor cancel out.
The charges within the conducting sphere will arrange themselves so that they cancel any imposed field from the charges outside the sphere. That rearrangement will not be symmetric.
 
  • Like
Likes OmegaKV
Doc Al said:
The charges within the conducting sphere will arrange themselves so that they cancel any imposed field from the charges outside the sphere. That rearrangement will not be symmetric.

Interesting, I hadn't previously considered that there are charges on the conductor when it is electrically neutral.
 
OmegaKV said:
I hadn't previously considered that there are charges on the conductor when it is electrically neutral.
Sure. What makes a conductor a conductor is the presence of mobile charge carriers (such as electrons) that can move easily in response to an imposed field. In the electrostatic case, the charges will move until the imposed field is canceled.
 
It's a mathematical theorem of potential theory. In the case of the sphere you can find the Green's function analytically, using the method of "image charges". You'll find that in the case that charges are present only outside of the sphere the field inside is 0.
 

Thread 'The Effect of Linear and Rotational Motion on Measured Weight'

Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
View full post »

Thread 'Coulomb gauge implies instantaneous radial electric field?'

Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
View full post »
Thread 'Does Poisson's equation hold due to vector potential cancellation?'

Thread 'Does Poisson's equation hold due to vector potential cancellation?'

Imagine that two charged particles, with charge ##+q##, start at the origin and then move apart symmetrically on the ##+y## and ##-y## axes due to their electrostatic repulsion. The ##y##-component of the retarded Liénard-Wiechert vector potential at a point along the ##x##-axis due to the two charges is $$ \begin{eqnarray*} A_y&=&\frac{q\,[\dot{y}]_{\mathrm{ret}}}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 c^2[(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}+y\dot{y}/c]_{\mathrm{ret}}}\tag{1}\\...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Electric Field Inside a Hollow Sphere
Replies
5
Views
1K
B Can charges move without a field? How charges redistribute without it?
Replies
16
Views
1K
Electric field external to Conducting Hollow Sphere with charge inside
Replies
23
Views
3K
I A "continous" gravitational field formula r=0 to infinity
Replies
16
Views
718
Work done to insert a point charge 𝑞 at the center of a conducting sphere
Replies
12
Views
1K
Induced charge on a conducting sphere sliced by a plane
Replies
2
Views
1K
I What's the correct argument for why E=0 inside a conductor?
Replies
14
Views
2K
The electric potential inside a conducting sphere with charge Q
Replies
11
Views
2K
E-field & hollow non-conducting sphere
Replies
6
Views
2K
Induced polarization for collision between conducting spheres
Replies
4
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top