Why is the Earth's size not odd?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AtomicJoe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth
AI Thread Summary
Earth is the largest of the terrestrial planets, being approximately 5% larger than Venus in diameter and 15% larger in volume, which raises questions about the factors influencing planetary size. The discussion highlights that Earth's size may be a result of chance events during its formation, including collisions and accumulation of materials. The Roche limit suggests there may be a maximum size for rocky bodies in the inner solar system, which Earth approaches. The Anthropic Principle is mentioned, proposing that larger planets in the habitable zone may be more conducive to life due to their ability to retain heavier atmospheric elements. Additionally, Earth's size is crucial for maintaining liquid water, as a smaller planet would struggle to hold onto its atmosphere, affecting its capacity to support life. Ultimately, the notion of Earth's size being "odd" is challenged, suggesting that its dimensions are not unusual given current understanding.
AtomicJoe
Messages
204
Reaction score
0
It is bigger than all it's neighbours, which is odd.
Obviously it is not as big as the gas giants but they are not real solid planets.


[PLAIN]http://blrdb.com/images/BlrDb_Astronomy_Planet_Sizes.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
I don't accept your premise: it is only 5% bigger than Venus, so that's not odd.
 
Well, Earth was a bit smaller until something the size of Mars made a glancing collision, donating its iron core, and their crustal debris congealed as our Moon...
 
russ_watters said:
I don't accept your premise: it is only 5% bigger than Venus, so that's not odd.

That is the diameter, the volume is 15% bigger, but nonetheless it is curious we are the biggest small planet.


What determined our size? And indeed the sizes of the other planets?

Somebody must know.
 
AtomicJoe said:
That is the diameter, the volume is 15% bigger, but nonetheless it is curious we are the biggest small planet.


What determined our size? And indeed the sizes of the other planets?

Somebody must know.
Chance determined the size. Things collide. Things collect together. Things get destroyed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formation_and_evolution_of_the_Solar_System
 
AtomicJoe said:
It is bigger than all it's neighbours, which is odd.
Obviously it is not as big as the gas giants but they are not real solid planets.[PLAIN]http://blrdb.com/images/BlrDb_Astronomy_Planet_Sizes.gif[/QUOTE]

The Earth may be close to the limit a rocky body can be and still have been stable during its formation in terms of the tidal forces in the inner solar system. Look up the Roche limit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
AtomicJoe said:
It is bigger than all it's neighbours, which is odd.
Obviously it is not as big as the gas giants but they are not real solid planets.


[PLAIN]http://blrdb.com/images/BlrDb_Astronomy_Planet_Sizes.gif[/QUOTE]

In the context of the universe, it's pretty damn small.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One may perhaps even speculate that there may be a touch of Anthropic Principle [1] at work here. For instance, it may conceivably be that it is more rare for life to evolve on a smaller planet that a large planet because smaller planets are less able to hold on to the heavier elements in an atmosphere. Or one could speculate that during solar system formation planets that form in the habitable zone [2] have a tendency to be "larger" rather than "smaller" through some mechanism.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habitable_zone
 
  • #10
As an above user said, a large Mars-sized body crashed into the Earth during its early development.

Also, being made of iron, naturally, gravity attracts the lighter elements.
 
  • #11
jduster said:
As an above user said, a large Mars-sized body crashed into the Earth during its early development.

Also, being made of iron, naturally, gravity attracts the lighter elements.

Gravity affects all elements almost equally. Until you get to a large fraction of the Earth's mass, the acceleration due to gravity on the surface is still about 9.8 m/s^2.
 
  • #12
What Filip Larsen mentioned may be interpreted as a form of natural selection. The Earth is the size it is because if it was much smaller, it could not allow us to come into existence.

Earth organisms need liquid water to metabolize and grow in, and water will not be liquid below its triple-point pressure. So there must be something creating that pressure, and on the Earth, it's the atmosphere. If the Earth was much smaller and less massive, its escape velocity would be much less, and its atmosphere would escape into outer space.
 
  • #13
^ which is what happened with the hydrogen and helium in our atmosphere during the early Earth
 
  • #14
I suspect that if Earth was the smallest planet in the solar system, you would be saying:

"It is smaller than all it's neighbours, which is odd.
Obviously it is not as small as the moons but they are not real planets."

There is nothing odd about the Earth's size. Or at least, we cannot say anything at this time with regards to it's oddness.
 
Back
Top