Why is the Flexural Wavelength Dependent on Density?

AI Thread Summary
The flexural wavelength (λ) is dependent on the density difference (Δρ) due to the relationship between mass, acceleration, and the bending properties of materials. When a mass is applied to a plate, both the depth and width of deflection are influenced by density differences, similar to how a bimetal strip behaves under thermal expansion. The flexural wave equation incorporates these factors, where mass is defined as density times volume, leading to a fourth-degree spatial term. This relationship illustrates that changes in density affect the wave's characteristics, including its wavelength. Understanding this dependency clarifies misconceptions about how mass influences bending without altering wavelength.
cpbrown
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm familiar with the derivation of flexural wavelength (λ=(4*D/gΔρ)^.25), but have no intuition for why λ's dependent on Δρ. My intuition tells me if you put a mass on a plate and it bends a little, then you increase the mass, the amplitude of the bend will change, but not the wavelength (assuming you're not stretching far enough to change the material properties). Anyone have any explanation to help with my false intuition? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Intersting topic, tectonics isn't it ? I have found the explanation in http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~ecalais/teaching/eas450/Gravity5.pdf. The model seems to consider only the balance between vertical load and resistance within a stack of two layers having different densities. For me it is quite intuitive that both the deflection depth and width depend on density difference. May be a useful analogy would be that of a bimetal strip whose deformation depends on the difference between the linear thermal expansion coefficients of the two metals, the only thing is that in this case horizontal forces should be balanced.
 
The answer is really pretty simple.

When generating the relevant flexural wave equation the force = mass times acceleration

and the mass = density times volume of the layer concerned.

The spatial term is a fourth degree term due to the flexural action thus



YI\frac{{{\partial ^4}\varphi }}{{\partial {X^4}}} = - \rho V\frac{{{\partial ^2}\varphi }}{{\partial {t^2}}}

The right hand side is the mass x acceleration term, \varphi is the displacement variable.
 
Last edited:
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top