Why is the PC incremented by 4 for superscalar pipelines?

AI Thread Summary
In MIPS assembly language, the program counter (PC) is incremented by 4 bytes for each instruction due to the fixed instruction length of 32 bits (4 bytes). This means that when executing in a superscalar pipeline that processes two instructions simultaneously, the PC must advance by 4 to account for the size of each instruction. The PC operates in terms of bytes rather than instructions, which is a key aspect of MIPS architecture. This design ensures that the PC correctly points to the next instruction in memory after the current one is executed.
Jusamyth
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello. I need some help with this question involving Pipelines. Any help would definatley be appreciative.

Why is the PC (Program Counter) is incremented by 4 for a superscalar pipeline which executes TWO instructions at a time

Thanks in Advance!
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
What architechture ?
 
MIPS assembly language
 
In MIPS, the program counter counts instructions in "bytes" instead of "instructions". In most implementations, PC<--PC+1 would move to next instruction but in MIPS, PC<--PC+1 moves to next byte.

In MIPS , each instruction is of fixed length of 32 bits or 4 bytes, which probably explains your question.

-- AI
 
That seems pretty logical. If MIPS is a 16-bit machine its "words" would consist of two bytes, so it has to skip ahead 2 per instruction and not 1.
 
This week, I saw a documentary done by the French called Les sacrifiés de l'IA, which was presented by a Canadian show Enquête. If you understand French I recommend it. Very eye-opening. I found a similar documentary in English called The Human Cost of AI: Data workers in the Global South. There is also an interview with Milagros Miceli (appearing in both documentaries) on Youtube: I also found a powerpoint presentation by the economist Uma Rani (appearing in the French documentary), AI...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
102
Views
847
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top