Why is the Product of a Negative and Positive Number Negative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Someone502
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding why the product of a negative and a positive number is negative. It highlights that this concept is rooted in mathematical axioms, particularly the distributive property and the concept of additive inverses. A clarification is made regarding the distinction between expressions like (-x)² and -x², emphasizing the importance of parentheses in determining the outcome. The conversation also touches on the need for precise definitions when discussing mathematical relationships. Overall, the explanation reinforces foundational principles of arithmetic.
Someone502
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
i tihnk this is a dumb question but why is -x*x=-y? i tried thinking about it like a arrays on a graph but it was kinda confusing.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You mean why the product of a negative and positive is negative? This follows from the axioms.
(-x)y + xy =[see note 1] (-x + x)y =[2] 0y =[3] 0. Since (-x)y + xy = 0,[4] (-x)y = -(xy).
1. by the distributive property
2. additive inverse
3. (0x = 0) is a theorem
4. (If x + y = 0, then x = -y) is a theorem
 
Last edited:
"-x*x= -y"? Well, that's not always true- it depends on what x and y are!

If you mean "why is a negative number times a positive number negative?" then honestrosewater gave a pretty good answer.
(what would DIShonestrosewater smell like?)

If you are wondering about the distinction between (-x)2 and -x2, it's a matter of the parentheses: (-2)2 means (-2)(-2), a product of two negative numbers, which is positive: 4. -22 means to FIRST square: 22= 4, THEN make it negative: -4.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
If you mean "why is a negative number times a positive number negative?" then honestrosewater gave a pretty good answer.
Is there another answer?
(what would DIShonestrosewater smell like?)
Fishy. :wink:
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top