Why Is the Sum of 1/2 (n+1)/2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theintarnets
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum
AI Thread Summary
The summation of 1/2 from i=0 to n results in (n+1)/2 because the index starts at zero, leading to n+1 total terms. Each term contributes 1/2, so the total is (n+1) times 1/2. This clarifies why the answer is not simply n/2, which would imply only n terms. Understanding the impact of the starting index is crucial in evaluating summations. The key takeaway is that the inclusion of the zero index adds an additional term to the total count.
theintarnets
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
I don't understand why the answer to this summation:
n
Ʃ 1/2
i = 0

is (n+1)/2
Why isn't it just n/2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
theintarnets said:
I don't understand why the answer to this summation:
n
Ʃ 1/2
i = 0

is (n+1)/2
Why isn't it just n/2?


Because the index starts at zero. 0,1,2,...n has n+1 terms.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top