Why is the sum of odd numbers is a square

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the pattern that the sum of the first n odd numbers equals n squared, illustrated through examples like 1=1^2 and 1+3+5=3^2. It highlights the use of mathematical induction to prove this relationship, emphasizing that geometric visualization can simplify understanding. The geometric explanation involves constructing larger squares from smaller ones, demonstrating how adding 2N+1 small squares (the next odd integer) forms the next larger square. This pattern continues consistently, reinforcing the connection between odd numbers and perfect squares. The conversation encourages further exploration of this mathematical phenomenon.
madah12
Messages
326
Reaction score
1
ok so I was messing with the calculator by adding only odd numbers together
1= 1^2 ,1+3=2^2 , 1+3+5=3^3 , 1+3+5+7=4^2,1+3+5+7+9=5^2 I continued this till 27 and i always got a square why is that?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's not hard to show this algebraically, but geometrically is easier to visualize.

Make a big square out of 4 smaller squares. Now, how
many small squares need to be placed on two adjacent sides to make a bigger square? You need 2 on one side and 2 on the other, and then you need one more square to fill the missing gap. For any big square made of N^2 small squares, you need 2N+1 additional small squares to make the next larger square. Well, 2N+1 is always the next larger odd integer in the sequence.
 
Last edited:
Draw a small sqaure.
Add 3 squares in an L shape round the edge, to make a 2x2 square
Add 5 more squares in an L shape to make a 3x3 square
Repeat till you get bored :smile:
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top