Why Is the Unit Normal Vector N(s) Defined as r''(s)/||r''(s)||?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 13K views
issisoccer10
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This question comes from my multivariable differential calculus course, and it pertains to arc length parametrizations the unit normal vector of a curve.

Why does the arc length parametrization of the unit normal vector of a curve, N(s) equal...

_r''(s)__ = N(s) and not just equivalent to r''(s) = N(s)?
||r''(s)||

Homework Equations


T(s) = r'(s)
||r'(s)|| = 1



The Attempt at a Solution


I thought that since ||r'(s)|| = 1, ||r''(s)|| would be equivalent to 1 as well since they are both the normalizations of arc length parametrizations of curves. However, this apparently isn't the case...any help would be appreciated

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, take a 'fer instance'. r(s)=(1/2)*(cos(2s),sin(2s)). r'(s) is unit length, r''(s) isn't.
 
I'm just seconding Dick. If a curve is paraemtrised by arclength [itex]\vec{r}(s)[/itex], then it follows from the definition of "arclength", and the chain rule, that the length of [itex]\vec{r}'[/itex] is 1. There is no reason to expect that to be true for [itex]\vec{r}''[/itex] as well.

Of course, [itex]\vec{r}''[/itex] is normal to the curve. I just doesn't have length 1.