Why is there gravity at a distance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Khashishi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Khashishi
Science Advisor
Messages
2,812
Reaction score
490
I'm trying to understand the Einstein field equations. My rough understanding is that the local curvature is due to the local stress-energy. Ok, a mass curves space...I get it. But, isn't space curved in the vacuum surrounding a mass? I mean, light is bent by a star even at some distance away from the star. Isn't the stress-energy zero outside the star?

Does this have something to do with the Weyl curvature which isn't included in the field equations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that there are a few different curvature tensors. The Ricci curvature tensor will be 0 in the vacuum surrounding a mass (per the EFE), but the Riemann curvature tensor may in general be non-zero.
 
I think there's a very nice analogy to E&M here. Even far away from the sources of the fields (the charges and currents), the fields themselves can exist. For example, in a static situation outside a charge distribution:

\nabla \cdot \vec{E} = 0

\nabla \times \vec{E} = 0

But it doesn't mean there is no electric field there. One has to consider boundary conditions. Similarly, Einstein's equations are second order differential equations, so even without a local source, boundary conditions can induce curvature.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top