Why is there no voltage drop through this resistor?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the lack of voltage drop across a resistor in a circuit involving a 9V battery, a capacitor, and an LED. The voltage readings show 6.5V across the capacitor and 1.5V across the LED, but 0V across the resistor. The explanation points to the behavior of capacitors, indicating that the capacitor is likely holding charge and not allowing current to flow through the resistor. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding capacitor function to grasp the circuit's behavior. The thread concludes with a reminder for politeness in future discussions.
trickybilly
Messages
16
Reaction score
4
I have wired in series: + of 9V battery --- + of 1000 uF capacitor --- 660 Ohm resistor --- + of a green LED --- - of the 9V battery. Remark: the 9V battery is a bit depleted 7.8 V unconnected.

Voltage drop across the capactor is 6.5V, across the LED is 1.5V but 0V across the resistor. Why there is no voltage drop across the resistor?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Try this:
1) discharge the capacitor by placing the resistor across it for several seconds.
2) connect everything back up except the LED to - of the battery
3) connect the - of the battery while carefully watching the LED.

What did you see?

4) now remove the capacitor

What do you see now?

BoB
 
trickybilly said:
I have wired in series: + of 9V battery --- + of 1000 uF capacitor --- 660 Ohm resistor --- + of a green LED --- - of the 9V battery. Remark: the 9V battery is a bit depleted 7.8 V unconnected.

Voltage drop across the capactor is 6.5V, across the LED is 1.5V but 0V across the resistor. Why there is no voltage drop across the resistor?
Do you understand how capacitors work?

EDIT: Let me rephrase that: you clearly don't yet understand how capacitors work, so that's where you should focus. Study capacitors for a bit and you will understand what is happening in your circuit. That's where rbelli1 is leading you.
 
@phinds I have received my answer. Do YOU understand it?

2r7y9so.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 2r7y9so.jpg
    2r7y9so.jpg
    35.1 KB · Views: 760
  • Like
Likes Tom.G
trickybilly said:
Do YOU understand it?
You'll bite a helping hand ? Thanks for the warning.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and phinds
Since the OP has been answered we will close this thread. Everyone, please remember to be polite in future threads.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and jim hardy
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top