Why Is There Vapour in Dry Ice Experiments?

  • Thread starter Thread starter turtleluc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Co2 Vapour
AI Thread Summary
Dry ice sublimates into gaseous CO2 when placed in water due to the temperature difference, causing rapid sublimation. The bubbles observed are primarily gaseous CO2, which does not fully dissolve in water due to its polar nature. The visible vapor is actually water vapor condensing into tiny droplets, resembling fog, as the dry ice cools the surrounding air. Caution is advised to avoid prolonged skin contact with dry ice to prevent frostbite. This experiment can be enhanced by using flavored drinks, making it more engaging for children.
turtleluc
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi there, could anyone help me pls. I want to show my sons kinder class what happens when you put Dry Ice (solid CO2) into water but would like to know for them and for me what the actual process is when it sublimates. I don't understand why there are so many bubbles or even why there is a vapour. I need to make it extremely simple for them but think an acurate explanation is important and I love these things myself so would like to know as well. Also, is there anything I should be careful of, I am going to buy a kilo as that is the smallest amount I can purchase and pop it in a glass jar. Thanks so much for any help you are able offer.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
The CO2 sublimates because the temp and the pressure of the surroundings. CO2 can be liquid, but requires conditions of temp. and pressure that we do not normally encounter. When you put dry ice in water, it sublimates more rapidly at first because the room temp water is heating the CO2 more rapidly than if it was just in room temp. air. The bubbles are gaseous CO2. The CO2 is not all going to dissolve in the water, especially considering that water is much more polar. The vapor you see is actually just like fog. Its water in the air condensing out into tiny droplets because the dry ice has cooled it so much the water condenses into these little droplets. So The vapor you see is not gaseous CO2 its water. This is my understanding anyways. and it makes sense to me.
 
Thank you so much for your help! I really do appreciate it. I think the kids should really enjoy it (I do)
 
Do it with kool-aid or grape juice, and lots of sugar, and you'll have soda pop!
http://www.wikihow.com/Carbonate-a-Beverage

Make sure to avoid prolonged skin contact with the dry ice, though, it can give you frostbite.
 
MATLABdude said:
Do it with kool-aid or grape juice, and lots of sugar, and you'll have soda pop!
http://www.wikihow.com/Carbonate-a-Beverage

Make sure to avoid prolonged skin contact with the dry ice, though, it can give you frostbite.

thanks very much for your advice, if I can get some dry ice today I will be taking it in and will try your suggestion, thanks!
 
As far as why there are so many bubbles, gaseous CO2 has a much lesser density than solid CO2
1.562 g/mL (solid at 1 atm and −78.5 °C)
1.977 g/L (gas at 1 atm and 0 °C)

Notice, that's more than 100 times the density. In other words, for every mL of dry ice you place in the water, you will get more than one liter of CO2 gas.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top