Why is this happening? (simple)

  • Thread starter Thread starter cdux
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the square root function and its non-linear nature. It highlights the misconception that the square root of a number is a fixed proportional reduction, using examples like the square root of 400 and 40 to illustrate this point. Participants clarify that the square root of a number does not translate linearly across different units, leading to varying results based on the scale of the input. The conversation also touches on unit conversion errors, particularly with kilometers and meters, emphasizing the importance of correctly applying unit conversions in mathematical operations. Ultimately, the thread reveals a deeper understanding of how square roots interact with different measurement systems.
cdux
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
Please let me understand this conceptually:

Why is the square root of 400 20 times smaller than 400, but the square root of 40 is not 20 times smaller than 40?

It may sound simple to say "because square root of X is not linear" but my main question is, why/how does that translate to physical laws and different units?

For example why is it right to say Y = square root of X when for an X in 4 meters the result would be 2 but for an X in 0,004 killometers it would be 0,006324.. kilometers!?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
cdux said:
but the square root of 40 is not 20 times smaller than 20?

Did you mean to say "20 times smaller than 40"?
 
cdux said:
For example why is it right to say Y = square root of X when for an X in 4 meters the result would be 2 but for an X in 0,004 killometers it would be 0,006324.. kilometers!?

Do you mean 0.0632? (one zero after the decimal not two?)

Edit:
##\sqrt{0.004} = \sqrt{4 \times 10^{-3}} = 2 \sqrt{10^{-3}}##

Notice that if we had ##\sqrt{0.04} = \sqrt{4 \times 10^{-2}} = 0.2##

10 squared gives 100 not 1000, but 1 kilometer = 1000 meters.
 
Dang I just realized why. I didn't square the kilo. lol.

Abandon ship! Abandon thread!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top