Why Is Total Mass Used as the Denominator in the Center of Mass Equation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The center of mass equation utilizes the total mass of the system as the denominator to calculate the weighted average position of all mass components. The formula is defined as x = (m1x1 + m2x2 + ...) / M total, where M total represents the sum of all individual masses. This approach ensures that the center of mass reflects the distribution of mass throughout the entire object rather than just a component. The misconception arises from confusing mass with vector quantities, as mass itself does not have directional components like force.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly mass and center of mass.
  • Familiarity with weighted averages and their applications in physics.
  • Knowledge of vector quantities and their properties.
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of weighted averages in physics and mathematics.
  • Explore the differences between scalar and vector quantities in physics.
  • Learn about the implications of center of mass in various physical systems.
  • Investigate applications of center of mass in engineering and design.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators explaining the center of mass concept, and anyone interested in understanding the mathematical foundations of physical systems.

PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10
so for the center of mass of an object..

x = (m1x1 + m2x2 + ...) / M total
y = (m1y1 + m2y2 + ...) / M total

how come in this equation the denominator is the total mass of the system? It seems like it would make more sense to have the denominator the total mass in whatever component you are trying to figure out...

i feel like it should be
x = (m1x1 + m2x2 + ...) / Mx total

and though i realize this is wrong i was hoping somebody could see what i think i see and explain where my thinking is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simply put, it's a weighted average.
 
Last edited:
Mass is also not a vector quantity (it has no components like a force, for instance).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K