Why isn't a molecule's kinectic energy dependant on mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aracali
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Mass
AI Thread Summary
A molecule's average translational kinetic energy is determined solely by temperature, not mass, because temperature reflects the average energy of all molecules in a gas. When two gases are at the same temperature, their molecules possess equal average kinetic energy despite differences in mass. Heavier molecules do have more inertia, which affects their speed, but this does not alter their average kinetic energy at a given temperature. When heat is applied, lighter gases will exhibit higher velocities, but the energy distribution remains consistent across different masses at the same temperature. Thus, the relationship between temperature and kinetic energy is independent of molecular mass.
aracali
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
So my book say's
"A molecule's average translational kinetic energy depends only on the temperature, not on the molecule's mass. If two gases have the same temperature, their molecules have the same average translational kinetic energy."​
My question is, why?
I mean, wouldn't molecules with bigger mass have more inertia and therefore would travel slower with the same amount of energy (which is related to temperature)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aracali said:
I mean, wouldn't molecules with bigger mass have more inertia and therefore would travel slower with the same amount of energy (which is related to temperature)?
Yes.
 
A.T. said:
Yes.
Also from my point view if we consider two different gases and we supply same amount of heat to both of them the one gas whose atoms are more heavier will have less kinetic energy and one which is lighter than the other one will have more kinetic energy
 
If heat is energy why would one gas end up with more than the other
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Back
Top