Why isn't R a domain for \frac{1}{2}(a+b\sqrt{2})?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Artusartos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Domain
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the set R defined as R = { (1/2)(a + b√2) }, where a and b are integers. Participants are exploring why this set is not considered an integral domain despite certain properties being discussed.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand the properties of the set R, particularly regarding its identity elements and the conditions under which products of elements can equal zero. Questions are raised about the implications of certain algebraic identities and the definitions of integral domains.

Discussion Status

Some participants are providing clarifications about the notation used for R and discussing the implications of specific algebraic identities. There is an ongoing exploration of the conditions that would lead to R not being an integral domain, with no clear consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a textbook question that instructs participants to prove that the set is not a domain, which adds a layer of constraint to the discussion.

Artusartos
Messages
236
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

If we have R = \{ \frac{1}{2}(a+b\sqrt{2}) \}.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



For the identity, we have a=2 and b=0. So the identity is not equal to zero. Also, there can't be any zero divisors, because...
[\frac{1}{2}(a+b\sqrt{2})][\frac{1}{2}(a'+b'\sqrt{2})] = \frac{1}{4}(aa' + ab'\sqrt{2} + a'b\sqrt{2} + 2bb'). If a,a',b, b' are not zero, then this can't be zero.

So why isn't it a domain?

Thanks in advance
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You haven't explained this very well! I take it that you do NOT mean "R= (1/2)(a+ b\sqrt{2})", a single number, but rather "R= \{(1/2)(a+ b\sqrt{2})\}", the <b>set</b> of all such numbers with a and b integers. Yes, if a= 2 and b= 0, we have (1/2)(2+ 0\sqrt{2})= 1 as multiplicative identity which is not 0, the additive indentity, so this is a ring with more than one member. <br /> <br /> Yes, in order that [(1/2)(a+ b\sqrt{2}][(1/2)(a'+ b'\sqrt{2})]= (1/4)(aa'+ ab'\sqrt{2}+ a'b\sqrt{2}+ 2bb') be 0, we must have aa'+ 2bb'= 0 and ab'+ a'b= 0. The second gives ab'= -a'b or a/b= -a'/b'. The first gives a/b= -2b'/a'. that is, -a'/b'= -2b'/a' or a'^2= 2b'^2 which is impossible. Now, what makes you believe this is not an <b>integral</b> domain?
 
HallsofIvy said:
You haven't explained this very well! I take it that you do NOT mean "R= (1/2)(a+ b\sqrt{2})", a single number, but rather "R= \{(1/2)(a+ b\sqrt{2})\}", the <b>set</b> of all such numbers with a and b integers. Yes, if a= 2 and b= 0, we have (1/2)(2+ 0\sqrt{2})= 1 as multiplicative identity which is not 0, the additive indentity, so this is a ring with more than one member. <br /> <br /> Yes, in order that [(1/2)(a+ b\sqrt{2}][(1/2)(a'+ b'\sqrt{2})]= (1/4)(aa'+ ab'\sqrt{2}+ a'b\sqrt{2}+ 2bb') be 0, we must have aa'+ 2bb'= 0 and ab'+ a'b= 0. The second gives ab'= -a'b or a/b= -a'/b'. The first gives a/b= -2b'/a'. that is, -a'/b'= -2b'/a' or a'^2= 2b'^2 which is impossible.<br /> <br /> <br /> Now, what makes you believe this is not an <b>integral</b> domain?
<br /> <br /> Thanks. I actually did write R={...}, but the brackets automatically got deleted. This is a question in my textbook. It tells us to prove that this set is not a domain, and I'm confused about that...
 
Artusartos said:
I actually did write R={...}, but the brackets automatically got deleted.

You may want to learn about the difference between {} and \{\} in LaTeX :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K