Why kinetic energy is proportional to velocity squared

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of why kinetic energy is proportional to the square of velocity rather than just velocity. Participants explore the implications of this relationship in the context of propulsion systems and energy transfer during acceleration, examining both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks for clarification on why kinetic energy is proportional to velocity squared, questioning the relationship between energy input and velocity change in a propulsion system.
  • Another participant explains that the work done on an object is related to force and distance, suggesting that the relationship involves both acceleration and velocity.
  • A later reply discusses the mathematical derivation of kinetic energy from the work-energy theorem, emphasizing the role of conservation of energy in establishing the proportionality to velocity squared.
  • Some participants express confusion about the implications of constant force and energy input, questioning how energy can be delivered at different rates for kinetic energy versus force.
  • One participant provides an example involving gravitational force, illustrating how potential energy converts to kinetic energy at varying rates as an object falls.
  • Another participant highlights that accelerating from higher speeds requires more energy than from lower speeds, prompting further questions about the nature of energy and force in this context.
  • Some participants argue that the rate of energy delivery is not constant when a constant force is applied, leading to a discussion about the relationship between force, velocity, and energy over time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the relationship between energy, force, and velocity, with some agreeing on the mathematical foundations while others remain confused about the implications in practical scenarios. No consensus is reached on the interpretation of energy transfer in propulsion systems.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion involves complex relationships between force, energy, and velocity, with some assumptions about constant force and energy input that may not hold in all scenarios. The mathematical derivations presented are not universally accepted as clear by all participants.

  • #91
Even battery energy is rated in watt hours (or in amp hours and you have to multiply by the voltage). In this case energy = power x time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K