Why light is remains massless even if travelling w/ the fastest velocity?

121910marj
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I got confused.. XD

"Under Einstein's theory of relativity, an object accelerated close to the speed of light gains a tremendous amount of mass.That is why no amount of energy can suffice to accelerate any object, even an elementary particle, to the speed of light - it becomes infinitely massive at the limit."

Photons are elementary particles that compose light. But as it travels at the speed of 3x10^8 m/s, i don't think it gain tremendous amount of mass, because light as we know is massless.

Please help. I got confused.

Thanks,
121910marj
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Light doesn't accelerate to c. It starts at c and always travels at c. So even if you use the concept of relativistic mass (which modern physicists do not) the above quote doesn't apply to light.
 
Yes, the statement that an object's mass grows as it accelerates only applies to massive particles. Massless particles travel exclusively at the speed of light.
 
DaleSpam & Pengwuino,
Thanks, it's all clear to me now.. :))
 
I thought that the mass grew because it need an increasing amount of power. Think of it like this. A rocket ship needs a lot of fuel. If it wants to go faster, it needs more fuel. If it wants to go at the speed of light, it needs an infinite amount of fuel, therefore infinitely massive, therefore impossible. Something like that. Kind of.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top