Why Must B Approach Zero in Cauchy-Euler ODE Solutions at x=0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andreol263
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Odes
Andreol263
Messages
77
Reaction score
15
Why these ODEs when applied some boundary conditions, like x = 0, their solution of the form Ax^k + Bx^(-k), B WILL have to go to zero?Like some problems which involve spherical harmonics...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The negative exponent of the B coefficient term implies divergent solution at x=0. If you are considering solutions with physical interpretation such as electron wave functions then the physical application is contradicted by the divergence at infinity. Those solutions don't apply and you set B = 0.
 
Yeah i understand why when x->infinity the solution is inconsistent, cause it's blow up, but i simply don't get it WHY x=0 implies in a divergent solution and B has to be 0, there's a more deep explanation?
 
B x^{-k}=\frac{B}{x^k} = \frac{B}{0} when x=0.
 
Oh damn, I'm stupid , i was thinking in that, but it appears so simple that i forget this option because some texts are very confusing , and thank you so much for killing that existential question for me :D...
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...
Back
Top