Why must equipotential surfaces be perpendicular to electric field lines?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Equipotential surfaces are always perpendicular to electric field lines due to the mathematical relationship defined by the equation dV = -E.ds. This indicates that the electric field vector (E) must be perpendicular to the displacement vector (ds) along an equipotential surface, as the dot product equals zero. Additionally, the gradient of a potential function is always perpendicular to level surfaces, reinforcing that a constant potential (equipotential surface) must align perpendicularly to the force vector derived from the potential function. This relationship is crucial for understanding electric fields and potential energy in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and potential energy
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, specifically dot products
  • Knowledge of gradient functions in multivariable calculus
  • Basic concepts of force and potential functions in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical properties of gradients in multivariable calculus
  • Explore the relationship between electric fields and potential energy in electrostatics
  • Learn about the implications of equipotential surfaces in electrical engineering
  • Investigate the physical interpretations of force vectors and their applications in mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of electric fields and potential energy in a comprehensive manner.

paul11273
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me to understand why equipotential surfaces must always be perpendicular to the electric field lines that pass through them?
My textbook gives what seems to be a simple mathematical explanation, but the logic is escaping me.
It states that dV= -E.ds = 0, (where the "." appears to be dot product of the two vectors -E and ds and so E must be perpendicular to the displacement of the equipotential surface.
I can understand that the dot product=0 means two vectors are perpendicular. I am looking for a more intuitive explanation to really understand what is going on.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mathematically, is true that a "level surface" for a function is always perpendicular to the gradient.

That is, if F is a function of x,y, z: F(x,y,z), its gradient is the vector Fxi+ Fyj+ Fzk (Fx is the partial derivative with respect to x, etc.) It can be shown that the derivative of F in the direction of any unit vector, v is grad F dot v. Along a "level surface", the function is a constant so taking v to be a vector tangent to that surface, Fv= grad F dot v= 0 since the function is constant on the surface.

Physically, the "potential function" is an anti-derivative of the force function. That is, if F is the potential function and f is the force vector, then f= -grad F. That means that a surface along which F is constant (an "equi-potential" surface) must be perpendicular to the force vector.

Another way of looking at it is this: if you move in the direction of the force vector, your potential goes down (just as moving down in a gravitational field reduces your potential energy). If you move at an angle to the force vector, you will still change your potential depending on the component of your motion parallel to the force vector (If you move down a hill side, you reduce your potential energy by the actual distance down: the component of motion parallel to the gravity force vector). There is no component of motion along a surface parallel to the force vector if and only if the force vector is perpendicular to the surface.
 
Thanks for your help.
I needed to be reminded about the gradient, and your down hill analogy has helped me to visualize this better. That is what I needed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
14K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K