Why Must the Real Part of \(c-a-b\) Be Positive in Gauss's Summation Formula?

Ted123
Messages
428
Reaction score
0
Why is the Gauss summation formula for complex parameters a,b,c: \displaystyle _2 F_1 (a,b;c;1) = \frac{\Gamma (c) \Gamma (c-a-b)}{\Gamma (c-a) \Gamma (c-b)} only valid for \text{Re}(c-a-b)>0,\;c\neq 0,-1,-2,-3,...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It makes sense that c\neq 0,-1,-2,-3,... so that \Gamma (c) is defined but why does \text{Re}(c-a-b) have to be positive?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top