Why P^-1AP forms a triangular matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter d.vaughn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forms Matrix
d.vaughn
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
why does (P^-1)AP form a triangular matrix?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
d.vaughn said:
why does (P^-1)AP form a triangular matrix?

If P=I, and A is not triangular, then clearly (P^-1)AP=A is not triangular.

It appears you need to supply more information.
 
for P, I have the matrix P = (4,-9; 4,-8) and the A matrix is A = (3,2; 2,1)
I found P^-1 to be (-1,2; 2,-3)
When I performed P^1AP, I got (-2,1; 0,-2) and I want to know why this formed a triangular matrix
 
Please refine your question. "P^{-1}AP" for general A and P is NOT "triangular" and it is not clear what conditions you intend on A and P.
 
d.vaughn said:
for P, I have the matrix P = (4,-9; 4,-8) and the A matrix is A = (3,2; 2,1)
I found P^-1 to be (-1,2; 2,-3)
When I performed P^1AP, I got (-2,1; 0,-2) and I want to know why this formed a triangular matrix

Do you understand eigenvalues? -2 is an eigenvalue with algebraic multiplicity 2, geometric multiplicity 1.

I.e. the charactersitic polynomial is (λ+2)2, but there is only eigenvector. In this case, the matrix is not diagonalizable. However, all matrices can be put into Jordan-Normal form, which a diagonal matrix is a special case of. If the matrix is diagonalizable, then P is a matrix with columns the eigenvectors. If it is not diagonalizable, then some of the columns of P will be eigenvectors, some of them will be what are called generalized eigenvectors.

Let J denote your Jordan matrix, J=P-1AP. Then PJ=AP. Then let P=[v w], where v and w are column vectors. Then PJ=[-2v v-2w], so Av=-2v, and Aw=v-2w. So v is an eigenvector, while w is "almost" an eigenvector.
 
d.vaughn said:
why does (P^-1)AP form a triangular matrix?

So in general, it is more than a triangular matrix, it is of the jordan form. That is one reason we did not recognize it sooner.

That is, when I hear triangular matrix, my brain goes into a freeze because I do not feel I know the full significance of those objects, with respect to where they arise and what properties they have.

Happy hunting!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top