While reviewing calculus, I noticed that James Stewart's Calculus 3rd ed., chap 14, problems plus (at the end of the chapter), p.965, prob#2 asks the student to show that(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\zeta(2)=\sum_{i=1}^\infty\frac 1{i^2}=\int_0^1 dx\int_0^1 dy\frac1{1-xy}=I_\circ[/tex]

by rotating the integration region by [itex]-\frac {\pi}4[/itex]. Mathworld also evaluates the same integral with the same rotation, http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RiemannZetaFunctionZeta2.html . Mathworld refers to Simmons (1992), which is Simmons, G. F. "Euler's Formula [itex]\sum_{k=1}^\infty\frac 1{k^2}=\frac {\pi^2}6[/itex] by Double Integration." Ch. B. 24 in Calculus Gems: Brief Lives and Memorable Mathematics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1992, which is in Google Books, but as usual, the needed page is missing.

1. I assume both Stewart and mathworld rotate the integration region in an attempt to remove the pole at (x,y)=(1,1). Rotating by

[tex]\begin{pmatrix}u\\v\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} \cos\frac {\pi}4&\sin\frac {\pi}4\\-\sin\frac {\pi}4&\cos\frac {\pi}4\end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}x\\y\end{pmatrix}[/tex]

gives

[tex]I_\circ=\int_0^{\frac 1{\sqrt2}} du\int_{-u}^u dv\frac 1{1-\frac 12(u^2-v^2)}+\int_{\frac 1{\sqrt2}}^{\sqrt2} du\int_{-\sqrt2+u}^{\sqrt2-u} dv\frac 1{1-\frac 12(u^2-v^2)}[/tex]

which still blows up at (u,v)=([itex]\sqrt2[/itex],0).

2. It seems to me that

[tex]\begin{align*}I_\circ&=\int_0^1 dx\int_0^1 dy\frac1{1-xy}\\&=\lim_{b\to 1^{-}}\int_0^b dx\lim_{a\to 1^{-}}\int_0^a dy\frac1{1-xy}\\

&=\lim_{b\to 1^{-}}\int_0^b dx\lim_{a\to 1^{-}}\int_0^a dy\sum_{i=0}^\infty x^iy^i\\&=\zeta(2)\end{align*}[/tex]

So why rotate if the rotated integrand still blows up?

Please be specific. Please stay as close as possible to the question. Thanks in advance.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Why rotate Beukers's 0th integral to calculate zeta(2)?

Loading...

Similar Threads - rotate Beukers's integral | Date |
---|---|

A Integrate f(x) = tanh(c*x^b)? Wolfram says not possible ... | Sunday at 2:00 PM |

B Rotating line - x axis point | Jul 14, 2016 |

I Prove centre of mass of an arc is rotationally invariant | Jul 13, 2016 |

I Finding the volume under the curve of a rotated function | Apr 27, 2016 |

Analytical continuation by contour rotation | Jun 4, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**