Why should rotating black holes emit particles?

AI Thread Summary
Rotating black holes are theorized to emit particles due to the uncertainty principle, which suggests that virtual particle pairs can form near the event horizon. When one particle of a pair falls into the black hole while the other escapes, this process results in Hawking radiation, allowing black holes to conserve energy and momentum. While all black holes are believed to radiate particles, rotating black holes are more common and exhibit enhanced particle emission through mechanisms like Penrose Pair Production (PPP). The photon sphere around rotating black holes plays a crucial role in this process, as it can trap photons that may lead to the production of particle pairs. Understanding these emissions is essential for explaining phenomena observed in quasars and other astrophysical objects.
Confuses
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In a brief history of time it says theft 'according to the uncertainty principle rotating black holes should emit particles'. However I do not understand why rotating black holes need to emit particles according to the uncertainty principle.

I do understand why black holes emit particles it is just the rotating black holes and The uncertainty principle thing that I do not understand.

Thanks in advance.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
My understanding is that Hawking radiation is a theory used to explain how black holes conserve energy. For example, we think black holes grow in size as they consume matter. Any particle that enters the Schwarzschild radius (SR) of a black hole is absorbed. QM purposes that virtual particles in the quantum field 'pop' in and out of existence all the time, but that they come in particle/anti-particle pairs that quickly annihilate one another, thus conserving energy and momentum in the universe. Hawking used this notion to theorize that virtual pairs that happen to 'pop' into existence on the event horizon (SR), are split up and do not annihilate each other as they usually do. One particle 'falls' into the black hole, while the other escapes and appears as Hawking Radiation. Since the black hole grows fractionally by swallowing one particle, and since the other particle in the pair is emitted as radiation, energy and momentum are conserved.
 
quantumtoast said:
My understanding is that Hawking radiation is a theory used to explain how black holes conserve energy.
A black hole in General Relativity alone does not emit Hawking radiation and conserves energy.

Since the black hole grows fractionally by swallowing one particle, and since the other particle in the pair is emitted as radiation, energy and momentum are conserved.
Hawking radiation causes black holes to shrink.@Confuses: There is nothing special about rotating black holes. All black holes are assumed to radiate particles (mainly photons). Rotating black holes are just the most common type of them in space.
 
There is something called Penrose Pair Production (PPP) which occurs with static black holes but increases significantly for rotating black holes with high spin-

Penrose Pair Production (PPP) A variant of the classical Penrose process is the Penrose Pair Production. The mechanism is based on another ingredient, the photon sphere. Photons are instably trapped in the photon sphere. Other photons may now infall on radial null geodesics and hit these trapped photons. If the energy of the quanta exceeds the rest frame energy of about one MeV, gamma photons produce pairs of leptons. For rather large values of the black hole spin, a>0.7, the spherically symmetric photon sphere plunges into the oblate ergosphere. Then, the PPP is expected to occur dominantly. PPP is sketched in Fig. 3.14. Williams applied this model to explain the populations of ultrarelativistic electrons in the quasars 3C 279 and 3C 273.

'Magnetohydrodynamics on the Kerr Geometry' by A Mueller
http://www.wissenschaft-online.de/astrowissen/downloads/PhD/PhD_AMueller.pdf
pages 47 & 48
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top