Why should there be CPT symmetry?

jetwaterluffy
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
A few of the books and magazines I have read talk about maintaining CPT symmetry, but I can't see why it should be the case. What is the evidence, theoretical or experimental, of CPT symmetry?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CPT invariance is a rigorous consequence of quantum field theory, assuming only locality and Lorentz invariance. The CPT Theorem is sometimes referred to as Lüder's Theorem. See for example Weinberg, Vol 1, p 245.
 
jetwaterluffy said:
A few of the books and magazines I have read talk about maintaining CPT symmetry, but I can't see why it should be the case. What is the evidence, theoretical or experimental, of CPT symmetry?

From an experimental point of view, violations of CPT have been searched

http://rmp.aps.org/abstract/RMP/v83/i1/p11_1
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top