Why Should You Integrate a Power Series from Zero?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of a power series, specifically addressing the rationale for integrating from zero in a particular context. Participants are exploring the implications of this integration within the framework of series and derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the necessity of integrating a power series from zero and expresses a desire to solve similar problems without relying on known series. Other participants discuss the process of differentiation and the recognition of series, while also questioning the implications of integrating from zero.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights into the integration process and the behavior of the series involved. Some guidance has been provided regarding evaluating constants of integration and the use of limits, though there is no explicit consensus on the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions around the radius of convergence and the implications of evaluating functions at specific points, particularly at zero, which raises questions about the validity of certain steps in the integration process.

hyper
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have a power series, and a problem with an integration with it, I don't understand why I should integrate it from zero at one point. I have attached a detalied explanation of the problem.

http://img79.imageshack.us/img79/5156/powerseriespt4.jpg

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you don't integrate anything, you simply expanded the sum incorrectly.

You are given that
[tex]g(x)= \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{x^{n+2}}{n(n+2)4^n}[/tex]
You say, correctly, that the derivative of that is, differentiating term by term,
[tex]g'(x)= \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{x^{n+1}}{n 4^n}[/tex]
Obviously, you can factor an "x" out of that leaving
[tex]g'(x)= x\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{x^n}{n 4^n}= x\sum{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n}\left(\frac{n}{4}\right)^n[/itex]<br /> [tex]g'(x)= x\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n}\left(\frac{x}{4}+1- 1\right)^n[/tex] <br /> and you should be able to recognize that last sum as the Taylor's series for ln(x) about x= 1.[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for your answer! I did not recognize that it was the series for ln(x) about one.

But I would like to know how I can solve excercises like this without recognizing known series. And if you look at what I have written you'll se that I do end up with the right answer without recognizing any known series, but I would like to know why.

I think it could be nice for me learning to solve problems like this without knowing how a lot of known series look like.

Have a nice day.
 
I'm sure you're past caring by now, but actually you were doing fine. All you need to do now is evaluate the constant of integration. This can be done by plugging in any value of x within the radius of convergence. For example, x=1 or x=3 will work, but again you'd need to recognize the series for ln(1-1/4) or ln(1-3/4), which you are trying to avoid.

To get around this, you need to "plug in" x=0. Of course, this is cheating, since g'(x)/x is undefined at x=0, but we step around that problem by using the limit of g'(x)/x as x APPROACHES 0. This is perfectly well-defined and easily evaluated to be equal to 0, since your equation (3) shows that away from 0, g'(x)/x is a power series with a factor of x.

Since g'(x)/x approaches 0 as x approaches 0, your last equation implies that C= ln(4) as required.

It is often useful with term-by-term integration problems to integrate from 0 to x as you suggest. This is equivalent to plugging in x=0 as above, since the integral of any integrable function from 0 to 0 is of course 0. Because of the x in the denominator in this problem, I think it's clearer to handle the way you did it.

Incidentally, I have bypassed some mathematical niceties regarding equating the limit of a function and the value of it's series expansion. Suffice to say that there is no problem because the series in question converges and is continuous in an interval around x=0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K