Why the change in internal energy is considered same?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the change in internal energy for ideal gases, particularly focusing on why the change in internal energy is expressed as mCvdT for constant volume processes and how this relates to other processes such as constant pressure, constant temperature, and constant entropy. Participants explore the implications of using Cv versus Cp and question the conditions under which these values apply.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the definitions of heat capacities and their relationship to internal energy changes. Questions arise about the assumptions underlying the ideal gas model and the implications of these assumptions on the behavior of internal energy under different thermodynamic processes.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the definitions of heat capacities and the behavior of internal energy for ideal gases. Some participants are seeking further clarification on specific derivations related to the properties of ideal gases, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

There are ongoing inquiries about the derivation of certain properties, such as ∂U/∂p|T = 0, and the implications of these properties for understanding internal energy changes in various processes. The discussion reflects a mix of established principles and areas where participants seek deeper understanding.

Elz
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
1.While studying the thermodynamic properties of perfect gases I saw that the change in internal energy for constant volume process is mCvdT. but it is also the same for const pressure, const temp, const entropy and other reversible non-flow processes. Why is it so?? why it is not mCpdT for const pressure process? The value of Cv and Cp are not same. And if we consider the same system working once for const volume and again for constant pressure then will the temp difference be same? I mean will both the process have same initial and final temperature? If the are same then how can be the value of dU be same as the values of Cv and Cp are different?
does it work like if i heat CO2 at constant pressure then the value of change in internal energy and if i heat the same amount of CO2 at const volume or const entropy then the value of change in internal energy will be same? I mean has it been experimentally established?




2. dU=mCvdT

Why not Cp for const pressure process?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
the change in internal energy for constant volume process is mCvdT. but it is also the same for const pressure, const temp, const entropy and other reversible non-flow processes. Why is it so??
What determines the change in internal energy: where does it come from?
 
First, C = dQ/dt, not dU/dt. So you have no basis in assuming C = dU/dt, whether C is constant pressure, constant volume, or anything else.

The proof that dU = CVdT for an ideal gas rests on the following:

1. Definition of an ideal gas. That definition comprises pV = nRT and also ∂U/∂p|T = 0.

From those two equations you can show that U must be a function of temperature only (and not of p or V).

Then, invoking the 1st law,
dU = dQ - pdV so that
dU/dT = dQ/dT - pdV/dT.

However, having shown that U = U(t) only, we know that pdV/dt = 0 and conclude that

dU/dT = CV for an ideal gas, independent of p or V.
 
Welcome to PF

thanks :)

Definition of an ideal gas. That definition comprises pV = nRT and also ∂U/∂p|T = 0.

From those two equations you can show that U must be a function of temperature only (and not of p or V).

Then, invoking the 1st law,
dU = dQ - pdV so that
dU/dT = dQ/dT - pdV/dT.

However, having shown that U = U(t) only, we know that pdV/dt = 0 and conclude that

dU/dT = CV for an ideal gas, independent of p or V.


Thanks a lot for replying. can u please explain how ∂U/∂p|T = 0 and pdV/dt = 0 is derived?
 
rude man said:
First, C = dQ/dt, not dU/dt. So you have no basis in assuming C = dU/dt, whether C is constant pressure, constant volume, or anything else.

The proof that dU = CVdT for an ideal gas rests on the following:

1. Definition of an ideal gas. That definition comprises pV = nRT and also ∂U/∂p|T = 0.

From those two equations you can show that U must be a function of temperature only (and not of p or V).

Then, invoking the 1st law,
dU = dQ - pdV so that
dU/dT = dQ/dT - pdV/dT.

However, having shown that U = U(t) only, we know that pdV/dt = 0 and conclude that

dU/dT = CV for an ideal gas, independent of p or V.

Thanks a lot for replying. can u please explain how ∂U/∂p|T = 0 and pdV/dt = 0 is derived?
 
Elz said:
Thanks a lot for replying. can u please explain how ∂U/∂p|T = 0 and pdV/dt = 0 is derived?

∂U/∂p|T = 0 is as I said part of the DEFINITION of an ideal gas.

Then we show that U ≠ U(V) as follows:
dU/dV|T = dU/dp|T * dp/dV|T
and dp/dV = -nRT/V2 = -p/V ≠ 0 but dU/dp|T = 0,
dU/dV|T = 0 and U ≠ U(V).

So both derivatives of U wrt to p and V are zero, so U ≠ U(p) ≠ U(V).
(Replace all "d" above with "∂").

dQ = dU + pdV = dU at constant volume. So
CV = ∂Q/∂T|V = ∂U/∂T|V

But for the special case of an ideal gas we know U = U(T) only,
so ∂U/∂T|V = dU/dT. QED
 
rude man said:
∂U/∂p|T = 0 is as I said part of the DEFINITION of an ideal gas.

Then we show that U ≠ U(V) as follows:
dU/dV|T = dU/dp|T * dp/dV|T
and dp/dV = -nRT/V2 = -p/V ≠ 0 but dU/dp|T = 0,
dU/dV|T = 0 and U ≠ U(V).

So both derivatives of U wrt to p and V are zero, so U ≠ U(p) ≠ U(V).
(Replace all "d" above with "∂").

dQ = dU + pdV = dU at constant volume. So
CV = ∂Q/∂T|V = ∂U/∂T|V

But for the special case of an ideal gas we know U = U(T) only,
so ∂U/∂T|V = dU/dT. QED

Thanks a lot... It explained everything. All my doubts are clear... :)
 
My friend Rude Man urged me to submit the following repsonse, which, for completeness, provides an alternate perspective on the answer to the OP's question.

The heat capacity at constant volume Cv and the heat capacity at constant pressure Cp are physical properties of a material, and are not wedded to the heat transferred in any specific process. These properties are precisely defined mathematically as:
C_v=(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T})_v
C_p=(\frac{\partial H}{\partial T})_p
where H is the enthalpy. For an ideal gas, U and H are functions only of temperature.

Here, for the case of a gas that is not necessarily ideal, is how these heat capacities can be applied in practice:
dH=TdS+VdP
If we regard the molar enthalpy as a function of T and P, then

dH=(\frac{\partial H}{\partial T})_PdT+(\frac{\partial H}{\partial P})_TdP

From these two equations, we have:

(\frac{\partial H}{\partial T})_P=C_p=T(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T})_P

and (\frac{\partial H}{\partial P})_T=T(\frac{\partial S}{\partial P})_T+V

Now, we need to evaluate (\frac{\partial S}{\partial P})_T. We obtain this from the equation for the differential change in Gibbs free energy:

dG=-SdT+VdP=(\frac{\partial G}{\partial T})_PdT+(\frac{\partial G}{\partial P})_TdP
From this, it follows that:
S=-(\frac{\partial G}{\partial T})_P
V=(\frac{\partial G}{\partial P})_T
If we take the partial of the first of these equations with respect to P and the partial of the second with respect to T, and sum the equations, we obtain:
(\frac{\partial S}{\partial P})_T=-(\frac{\partial V}{\partial T})_P
Substituting back into the equation for dH, we have
dH=C_P+(V-T(\frac{\partial V}{\partial T})_P)dP

Note that the coefficient of dP in this equation is equal to zero for an ideal gas, but it is not equal to zero beyond the ideal gas region. This equation provides us with what we need to include the effect of pressure on enthalpy. But, to evaluate the second term, we need to know the equation of state (EOS) of the material, beyond the ideal gas region.
 
Chestermiller said:
My friend Rude Man urged me to submit the following repsonse, which, for completeness, provides an alternate perspective on the answer to the OP's question.

Thanks a lot Chestermiller,and give my thanks to Rude Man too...
 
  • #10
Oops. There is a glitch in the final equation in my recent reply. The final equation should read:

dH=C_PdT+(V-T(\frac{\partial V}{\partial T})_P)dP

Sorry for the error.

Chet
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K