Why the limitation on the number of dimensions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
Apriori, I don't see why there should be 10,11 or 12 dimensions?

Can't we have indefinitely number of dimensions?

Or such an option isn't viable cause we can't test it empirically (not that the hypothesis of less dimensions is testable either, besides the 3+1 we know already).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
10, 11 dimensions is a prediction of string theory, and not an apriori statement about space time. The dimension is predicted usually under a condition of consistency, which then depends of the specifics of the theory (such as fundamental particles being strings).

For bosonic string theory, that is string theory without supersymmetry or fermions, the cancellation of the conformal anomaly requires 26 dimensions. You can also come to this conclusion by doing a "light cone" quantization, which is not manifestly lorentz invariant, and then imposing the condition that the theory needs to be lorentz invariant. This condition also requires 26 dimensions. However, despite the anomaly cancellation, this theory still predicts a tachyon. In order to remove the tachyon, one also imposes supersymmetry, which changes the calculations above so that now the required dimension is 11.

There are people trying to find a way around these conditions, in a subject called non-critical string theory (the required number of dimensions is called the critical dimension). I don't know much about these approaches.

Other theories do not predict that number of dimensions. Loop quantum gravity in principle works for any number of dimensions, although much of the work has used mathematical tricks that only work in 4 dimensions. There are also old kaluza klein models, which are models of extra dimensions. These have a fair number of problems, but they can be done in many different dimensions.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top