- #1

- 14

- 0

Please help me, anyone?

- Thread starter henrywang
- Start date

- #1

- 14

- 0

Please help me, anyone?

- #2

maajdl

Gold Member

- 388

- 28

To make progress, it is preferable to restrict the scope of the question.

I suggest you to first think about how heat flows between a cold and a hot body.

As time goes from past to future, heat always goes from the hot body to the cold body.

This is an experimental fact.

It is not totally true, however, since deviations can be observed at very small scales.

But for macroscopic objects, those fluctuations where heat goes from cold to hot are never observed.

So, you see that the size of the system is already a key to the understanding of the second.

The laws of mechanics at the molecular level are reversible with respect to time.

If a certain process can be observed, the same process but reversed in time can also be observed.

This is not true -apparently- at the macroscopic level.

The great number of "molecules" is the main reason for the irreversibility observed at the macroscopic level.

The "normal process" is "heat goes from hot to cold", the time-reversed process cannot be observed.

Why can it never be observed? Is it really impossible?

It depend on the point of view.

Mechanically the reverse process if perfectly possible.

The impossibility comes from the extreme difficulty (ie impossibility) to prepare an experiment where heat would flow from cold to hot.

It would imply a control of each molecule of the experiment, while in normal life we tend to "lose control".

The second law of thermodynamics looks very different from all other laws of physics.

It seems unrelated to fundamental laws of nature at the microscopic level.

It looks like it more about how we can interact with the world.

Read also about the Poincaré recurrence time.

You will see then that if we could wait an extremely long time, we could always observe violations of the second law.

The second law, the entropy increase, appears then more as a statement about what we could expect in real-life, despite the reversibility of molecular physics.

- #3

- 3,540

- 1,364

- #4

- 14

- 0

My intuition tells me exactly the same thing as well. But why energy like to be evenly distributed? This goes back to the old question. Because energy is more distributed or spread out when total entropy increase.

- #5

- 3,540

- 1,364

Well at least in the case of heat flow we try to explain using the collision mechanism, because there is some sort of symmetry in a collision. When particle A collides with B and trasfers energy to B then B also collides with A and transfers energy to A. If B which is in lower energy manages to transfer big energy to A then A will manage to transfer even more energy to B. Otherwise it would be like there is some sort of different laws of nature for particle A than particle B.But why energy like to be evenly distributed? .

- #6

- 14

- 0

Two particles, one with more kinetic energy, one with less.Well at least in the case of heat flow we try to explain using the collision mechanism, because there is some sort of symmetry in a collision. When particle A collides with B and trasfers energy to B then B also collides with A and transfers energy to A. If B which is in lower energy manages to transfer big energy to A then A will manage to transfer even more energy to B. Otherwise it would be like there is some sort of different laws of nature for particle A than particle B.

So basically it is more likely for the more energetic particle to pass larger amount of energy to the less energetic particle than the situation reversed.

- #7

jtbell

Mentor

- 15,722

- 3,858

In statistical thermodynamics, it's basically a consequence of statistics of large numbers. It's not always true, but the "not always" becomes utterly insignificant in a macroscopic system with a very large number of particles.

Consider a box with ten molecules of air in it, and mentally divide it in half. Maximum entropy is when five molecules are in each half, and in fact that's the most likely situation. If you leave the box alone and wait a while, you will eventually find all ten molecules in one half (at least briefly), a situation with a much smaller entropy.

On the other hand, if you have a mole of molecules in the box, the probability of all of them being in the left half is so very very very very small that we can say it's impossible for all practical purposes, even if we wait many times the life of the universe.

- #8

- 315

- 11

- #9

- 14

- 0

thank you guys. thats very helpful!

- #10

- 315

- 11

At any rate it's not a trivial question because it implies that the universe started in an extremely ordered = statistically extremely improbable state (and this means REALLY EXTREMELY IMPROBABLE), which is one of the big puzzles when we take this view of purely statistical probability interpretation of entropy. But it's the best we have by now I believe.thank you guys. thats very helpful!

- #11

- 315

- 11

Gravity has the capability to decrease entropy, from a tenuous cloud of uniform cold gases it can convert it into a hot burning star surrounded by supercold empty space (a more ordered state in both the spatial distribution of the particles as well as in their temperature).

On small scales gravity is too weak so in our everyday experience we see only entropy increasing processes but if we look at the universe large scales, the processes we see are mostly entropy-decreasing, initially quasi-uniform huge clouds of particles at quasi-uniform temperatures condense in discrete stars and planets separated by voids of empty space.

I think that there is no universally accepted opinion about the role of gravity in the total universe entropy, whether maybe the entropy decrease caused by gravity on large scales could compensate for the entropy-increasing processes which dominate at small scales.

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 830

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 891

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 989

- Last Post

- Replies
- 16

- Views
- 9K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 569

- Last Post

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 808

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 2K