Why transformer voltages in phase?

  • Thread starter Thread starter teroenza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phase Transformer
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on why the voltages of the primary and secondary coils of a transformer are in phase when an AC voltage is applied to the primary with no load on the secondary. It explains that the primary voltage leads the current by 90 degrees, while the magnetic flux in the core is in phase with the primary current. The induced EMF in the secondary coil is derived from this flux, resulting in the secondary voltage being in phase with the primary voltage. The time derivative relationship between flux and induced EMF is clarified, confirming that the secondary voltage aligns with the primary voltage's phase. Overall, the logic concludes that both voltages are indeed in phase due to their interrelated behaviors in the transformer system.
teroenza
Messages
190
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Why are the voltages of the primary and secondary coils of a transformer in phase? The transformer is a simple one with two coils, and an iron core. A.C. voltage applied to the primary, no load on the secondary.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Voltage in the primary is 90 degrees ahead of the current. The flux in the core changes with the current and is this "in phase" with the current (unsure of the correct terminology). The core acts a a "flux pipe" and transfers the flux through the secondary. Flux through secondary induces an EMF/voltage in the secondary. Voltage of secondary in phase with flux in phase with current of primary. So voltage in secondary would be 90 degrees behind that of the voltage in the primary.
Can someone point out where my logic is failing?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Voltage of secondary coil is not in phase with the flux, because it is a time derivative of the flux, isn't it?
 
So if current in the primary varies as a sine wave, so does flux, and then because induced emf is time derivative of the flux, the induced emf varies as a cosine wave (derivative of sine). Because the current in the primary was 90 behind the primary's voltage to begin with, primary voltage varies as a cosine and is thus in phase with voltage in the secondary?
 
teroenza said:
So if current in the primary varies as a sine wave, so does flux, and then because induced emf is time derivative of the flux, the induced emf varies as a cosine wave (derivative of sine). Because the current in the primary was 90 behind the primary's voltage to begin with, primary voltage varies as a cosine and is thus in phase with voltage in the secondary?
Yes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top