Why ∆u=Cv ∆T for isochoric transformation of non-ideal gases?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship ∆u=Cv ∆T for isochoric transformations in non-ideal gases. It clarifies that while this equation holds for ideal gases across all transformations, it specifically applies to isochoric transformations for non-ideal gases. The definition of Cv as the limit of ∆u/∆T as ∆T approaches zero is emphasized, linking it to internal energy dependence on temperature. The first principle of thermodynamics is cited to explain that in isochoric processes, where no work is done, the change in internal energy equals the heat added, reinforcing the equation. The conversation seeks to understand the derivation of this principle for non-ideal gases.
maCrobo
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
I simply report what I read:
"For an ideal gas, but for every kind of transformation ∆u=Cv ∆T, while for every kind of material in the thermodynamic system, but only for isochoric transformation ∆u=Cv ∆T."

Where does this second statement come from?
Everything is clear about ideal gases, but I don't figure out how to prove the second part of this statement.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is how Cv is defined.

Cv is the limit when ∆T goes to zero of ∆u/∆T. The first statement is simply a consequence of internal energy being dependant only of T for an ideal gas.
 
maCrobo said:
I simply report what I read:
"For an ideal gas, but for every kind of transformation ∆u=Cv ∆T, while for every kind of material in the thermodynamic system, but only for isochoric transformation ∆u=Cv ∆T."

Where does this second statement come from?
Everything is clear about ideal gases, but I don't figure out how to prove the second part of this statement.
It follows from the first principle of thermodynamics. In isochoric transformations the work (compression-expansion work) is zero so Δu=Qv.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top