Why unequal fringe width in Michelson interference pattern?

AI Thread Summary
Unequal fringe width in a Michelson interference pattern is attributed to the formula β=λ/2nθ, where n represents the order of the fringe. The discussion emphasizes that this phenomenon is not solely due to imperfections in the apparatus, as commonly suggested. Participants highlight the lack of comprehensive explanations in textbooks regarding this formula. There is a call for more detailed information to clarify the understanding of fringe width variations. Overall, the conversation seeks to deepen the understanding of the mathematical principles behind the observed interference patterns.
sree.
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
why unequal fringe width in Michelson interference pattern?
 
Science news on Phys.org


Welcome to PF;
If I understand you correctly - this is due to imperfect equipment.
 
Dear Simon,
I don't think it is due to apparatus imperfection. There is a formula for fringe width which is given by β=λ/2nθ, where n is the order of the fringe. but none of the textbook has given the explanation for this.
 
If you post a vague message, and come in once a month to update it with only minimal new information, it will take you a very long time to get your answer.
 
sree. said:
Dear Simon,
I don't think it is due to apparatus imperfection. There is a formula for fringe width which is given by β=λ/2nθ, where n is the order of the fringe. but none of the textbook has given the explanation for this.
Well then I clearly did not understand you. You will have to provide more information about what you are talking about.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top