Why Use Nitric Acid for Heavy Metal Digestion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the use of nitric acid for the digestion of water samples in the detection of heavy metals like copper and lead through atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). The original poster questions why nitric acid is preferred over other acids for this process, suggesting that the choice may depend on the specific heavy metal being analyzed. However, responses clarify that nitric acid is favored because it effectively dissolves metals without forming insoluble sulfates or volatile chlorides. Additionally, there is a correction regarding terminology, emphasizing that AAS relies on the atomization of the analyte rather than its absorption. This highlights the importance of precise language in scientific discussions.
Henokh96
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I already done an experiment for detecting the presence of heavy metals(copper and lead) .

The last step for detection is through the absorption of analyte by atomic absorption spectroscopy.

Before that step to be done, the first process is to digest the water sample in the fume chamber.

And my question is that why on Earth are we using nitric acid for the digestion? Why not use the other types of acid?

If I am right , the reason why depends the type of heavy metal that we wanted to achieve .
Tell me if I am wrong :) tq
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You are wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes Henokh96
OK, more seriously - sulfates tend to be insoluble, chlorides tend to be volatile.

Watch your language. This:

Henokh96 said:
absorption of analyte by atomic absorption spectroscopy

is wrong. AAS is not based on the "absorption of analyte".
 
Borek said:
You are wrong.
Further explanation might help sir
 
Borek said:
OK, more seriously - sulfates tend to be insoluble, chlorides tend to be volatile.

Watch your language. This:
is wrong. AAS is not based on the "absorption of analyte".
Atomized analyte correct?
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top