Why Was Mass Given for Work Calculation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter teggenspiller
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the work done by a 200 N force moving a 55 kg television across a 10 m surface, resulting in a work value of 6000 J. Participants question the relevance of the mass provided in the problem, suggesting it may serve to test understanding of physics principles and problem-solving skills. The mass could also be necessary for potential follow-up questions related to kinetic energy or other calculations. The inclusion of mass adds specificity to the problem and reinforces the importance of discerning relevant information. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the educational purpose behind including seemingly extraneous details in physics problems.
teggenspiller
Messages
94
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A horizontal force of 200 N is applied to move a 55 kg television set across a 10 m level surface. What is the work done by the 200 N force on the television set?



ke= 1/2 m*v^2

w=f*d





Homework Equations


I can find work: :6000J




The Attempt at a Solution



So why was the value of mass given?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
teggenspiller said:
So why was the value of mass given?
To see if you know what you're doing, perhaps. Part of being able to solve a problem is knowing what matters and what doesn't. Giving more details also makes the description more specific. And you may need the mass for follow up questions.
 
Wow. Thanks alot. Knew they were trying to f with me.
 

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Similar threads

My Mistake? Understanding Friction Force & Work Done on Snowy & Icy Surfaces
Replies
29
Views
2K
Distribution of Energy when work is done on a system of 2 masses connected by a spring
Replies
17
Views
2K
A cylinder connected to a hanging mass
Replies
21
Views
334
Stretching of a rotating spring
Replies
8
Views
2K
Solving for Work Done When Accelerating a Mass
Replies
3
Views
785
Misunderstanding Work-energy theorem and center of mass properties
Replies
7
Views
2K
Rocket + Connected Body Dynamics problem
Replies
47
Views
3K
Work energy theorem problem -- Block sliding up a curved incline
Replies
10
Views
1K
How to Correctly Solve for the Minimum Distance Between Two Electrons?
Replies
5
Views
1K
Work done by the force of a man on a crate of 80N
Replies
14
Views
6K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top