Why Were My Forum Posts Deleted Twice?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kevvek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    noble prize
AI Thread Summary
The user's posts were deleted due to perceived non-seriousness and redundancy. The first post about becoming a Nobel Prize-winning physicist was labeled a "crackpot" idea, leading to a warning. The second post, which asked for favorite physics or math books, was considered redundant because similar discussions exist in the Science Textbook Discussion forum. The community emphasized the importance of presenting serious inquiries to receive constructive feedback. Overall, a more mainstream approach to topics is recommended for better engagement.
Kevvek
First, I wrote about wanting to become a Noble Prize-winning theoretical physicist, and asked which books are best to achieve this goal. The post was deleted and I received a warning from Evo stating that no crackpot posts are allowed. Okay, fine, I won't write about any of my wild dreams. Next, I made another post asking what are your (the people in Academic Guidance forum) favourite physics or math books, and asked that they give an explanation why. Again, the post was deleted.

Why was the second post deleted? (I didn't receive an explanation or anything)

Thank you for your time.

Kevvek
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Evo is generally pretty good - if you are having trouble understanding why your posts keep getting deleted have another look through the rules.
... I would guess that the second thread got deleted because it looked like a way to sneak the first one in by the back door.

It may be that PF is not the place for the kinds of things you want to discuss.
You could try being more main-stream while you get used to the place - like: ask some physics questions? There are plenty of threads about which textbooks are good for what.
 
Kevvek said:
First, I wrote about wanting to become a Noble Prize-winning theoretical physicist, and asked which books are best to achieve this goal. The post was deleted and I received a warning from Evo stating that no crackpot posts are allowed. Okay, fine, I won't write about any of my wild dreams. Next, I made another post asking what are your (the people in Academic Guidance forum) favourite physics or math books, and asked that they give an explanation why. Again, the post was deleted.

Why was the second post deleted? (I didn't receive an explanation or anything)

Thank you for your time.

Kevvek

The second thread was deleted in relation to the other one. Furthermore, considering that we have a huge section on physics and mathematics texts in the Science Textbook Discussion forum, it became redundant.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
The second thread was deleted in relation to the other one. Furthermore, considering that we have a huge section on physics and mathematics texts in the Science Textbook Discussion forum, it became redundant.

Zz.

I found the STD forum, thanks. You saved me a lot of grief because I probably would have posted the same question in Academic Guidance, only to be banned. I must admit, I didn't see it at first due to my need of eyeglasses.

Cheerios
 
Kevvek said:
I found the STD forum, thanks. You saved me a lot of grief because I probably would have posted the same question in Academic Guidance, only to be banned. I must admit, I didn't see it at first due to my need of eyeglasses.

Cheerios
I sent you a zero point "General Information" notice to advise you that your post was deleted. Asking for books so you can self learn is fine, your post was not. I didn't see a second post from you, that was deleted by another mentor.

You're being overly melodramatic about a ban over a simple notice. If you are serious about learning then you need to post as if you are serious. Planning to be a self taught Nobel Prize winner is fine and dandy but being flippant and coupled with posting things like
Why waste time and money on school when you can get a better education on your own, right? Exactly!
Does not make anyone take you seriously. You came across as someone posting as a joke.

This forum has many incredible, knowledgeable, helpful people, and if you come across as someone with a serious desire to learn, you will have a golden opportunity to be helped.
 
Last edited:
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
502K
Back
Top