Why would I want to fix a gauge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hideelo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gauge
AI Thread Summary
Fixing a gauge in gauge theory, such as the Lorentz gauge in electromagnetism, is often seen as artificial and potentially neglecting real symmetries present in the equations. The discussion emphasizes that choosing a specific gauge can remove degrees of freedom that are not inherently physical, leading to concerns about excluding cases that do not satisfy the chosen constraint. The essence of gauge theory is that physical results should remain invariant regardless of the gauge selected, allowing for computations in any gauge. However, proponents argue that fixing a gauge simplifies calculations without affecting physical observables. Ultimately, the debate centers on balancing computational convenience with the fundamental principles of gauge invariance.
hideelo
Messages
88
Reaction score
15
If I have a theory withsome gauge symmetry, I don't understand why we want to fix a gauge. It seems to me to be
1. artificial
2. ignoring a real symmetry of the equations

For example in electromagnetism, we can use the lorentz gauge, but why would I? It removes a degree of freedom that should be there and in its place puts in a constraint that has no basis in the physics of the system.

Edit: to emphasize this, if we choose the Lorentz gauge, aren't we throwing out all cases that don't satisfy that constraint? What happens to those cases?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The entire point of gauge theory is that your result does not depend on the gauge you select. Thus, you can pick any gauge and do your computations in that gauge. If you do not, you will be left with quantities (such as the vector potential) which are determined only up to arbitrary gauge transformations. You are only removing degrees of freedom which are not physical.

Edit: If you want to be a bit more stringent about it. Gauge theory is a theory of equivalence classes of gauge potentials, the equivalence being that potentials resulting in the same physical observables are equivalent. You can pick any representative from the equivalence class and do the computations with it.
 
  • Like
Likes hideelo
hideelo said:
I don't understand why we want to fix a gauge.
To simplify computations.

hideelo said:
It removes a degree of freedom that should be there
The degree of freedom that is removed is not a physical degree of freedom.
 
  • Like
Likes hideelo
...Lorenz not the other guy.
 
  • Like
Likes Orodruin
cosmik debris said:
...Lorenz not the other guy.
You are right, I stand corrected
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top