Wigner distribution in phase space

aim1732
Messages
428
Reaction score
2
This is about a specific property of the Wigner distribution in phase space. My professor mentioned the other day that the Wigner distribution treats all functions of momentum and space on the same footing as momentum itself or at least that's what I recall.He mentioned a specific problem where we had to show the following:

Considering the operator qcosθ + psinθ = qθ
and -qsinθ + pcosθ = pθ

such that qθ |qθ> = qθ|qθ>

We had to show that ∫ dpθW'(qθ,pθ) = |<qθ|ψ>|2
where W is the Wigner dis.
You may find the problem a little hazy(so do I). Even my professor said that it he did not recall it exactly and it might not be properly defined.If anyone has seen this or might have a useful suggestion please help me.I would be very thankful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aim1732 said:
This is about a specific property of the Wigner distribution in phase space. My professor mentioned the other day that the Wigner distribution treats all functions of momentum and space on the same footing as momentum itself or at least that's what I recall.He mentioned a specific problem where we had to show the following:

Considering the operator qcosθ + psinθ = qθ
and -qsinθ + pcosθ = pθ

such that qθ |qθ> = qθ|qθ>

We had to show that ∫ dpθW'(qθ,pθ) = |<qθ|ψ>|2
where W is the Wigner dis.
You may find the problem a little hazy(so do I). Even my professor said that it he did not recall it exactly and it might not be properly defined.If anyone has seen this or might have a useful suggestion please help me.I would be very thankful.

If the system is in a pure state with wave function \Psi ( x ), the Wigner function is defined by
<br /> W( x , p ) = \frac{ 1 }{ \pi } \int dy \ \Psi^{ * } ( x + y ) \Psi ( x - y ) e^{ 2 i y p }<br />
or, in terms of the density matrix \rho ( x , \bar{ x } ):
<br /> W( x , p ) = \frac{ 1 }{ \pi } \int dy \ \rho ( x + y , x - y ) e^{ 2 i y p }<br />
OK, can you now convert the Wigner function back to the following density matrix?
<br /> \rho ( x , \bar{ x } ) = \int dp \ W \left( \frac{ x + \bar{ x } }{ 2 } , p \right) e^{ - i p ( x - \bar{ x } ) }<br />
\rho ( x , x ) is your answer.
 
  • Like
Likes physicsclaus
Yes I can.I will Fourier invert the expression for W(x,p) after assuming 2y=y'(say).Then I will make the appropriate substitution to get the expression for the density matrix.However I am still not sure what to make of it.My doubt primarily revolves around what function I have to employ as in:
∫ dpθW'(qθ,pθ) = |<qθ|ψ>|2

Here the expression is trivially reduced to a marginal if I consider taking the Wigner function W'(qθ,pθ) as being defined in terms of the wave function in the vector space of eigenfunctions of qθ.Is this what I have to show?I mean that would be trivially true because we have already shown that the marginal of W(p,q) reduces to the probability distribution in the vector space of the other variable.

Please specify exactly what you had in mind when you said that.I might be missing something obvious because I am after all a lost undergrad who can not locate appropriate sources to get a hang of this distribution.
Regards
Aiman.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Back
Top